4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 4ca60d08cbe65f501baad64af50fceba79c19fbb ]
consider a bridge with mtu 9000, but end host sending smaller
packets to another host with mtu < 9000.
In this case, after reassembly, bridge+defrag would refragment,
and then attempt to send the reassembled packet as long as it
was below 9k.
Instead we have to cap by the largest fragment size seen.
Signed-off-by: Florian Westphal <fw@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Pablo Neira Ayuso <pablo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c | 12 +++++++-----
1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
+++ b/net/bridge/br_netfilter_hooks.c
@@ -706,18 +706,20 @@ static unsigned int nf_bridge_mtu_reduct
static int br_nf_dev_queue_xmit(struct net *net, struct sock *sk, struct sk_buff *skb)
{
- struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge;
- unsigned int mtu_reserved;
+ struct nf_bridge_info *nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
+ unsigned int mtu, mtu_reserved;
mtu_reserved = nf_bridge_mtu_reduction(skb);
+ mtu = skb->dev->mtu;
- if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= skb->dev->mtu) {
+ if (nf_bridge->frag_max_size && nf_bridge->frag_max_size < mtu)
+ mtu = nf_bridge->frag_max_size;
+
+ if (skb_is_gso(skb) || skb->len + mtu_reserved <= mtu) {
nf_bridge_info_free(skb);
return br_dev_queue_push_xmit(net, sk, skb);
}
- nf_bridge = nf_bridge_info_get(skb);
-
/* This is wrong! We should preserve the original fragment
* boundaries by preserving frag_list rather than refragmenting.
*/