[PATCH 4.9 140/177] ASoC: rsnd: rsnd_ssi_run_mods() needs to care ssi_parent_mod

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 21781e87881f9c420871b1d1f3f29d4cd7bffb10 ]

SSI parent mod might be NULL. ssi_parent_mod() needs to care
about it. Otherwise, it uses negative shift.
This patch fixes it.

Signed-off-by: Kuninori Morimoto <kuninori.morimoto.gx@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c |   11 ++++++++---
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
+++ b/sound/soc/sh/rcar/ssi.c
@@ -172,10 +172,15 @@ static u32 rsnd_ssi_run_mods(struct rsnd
 {
 	struct rsnd_mod *ssi_mod = rsnd_io_to_mod_ssi(io);
 	struct rsnd_mod *ssi_parent_mod = rsnd_io_to_mod_ssip(io);
+	u32 mods;
 
-	return rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(io) |
-		1 << rsnd_mod_id(ssi_mod) |
-		1 << rsnd_mod_id(ssi_parent_mod);
+	mods = rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(io) |
+		1 << rsnd_mod_id(ssi_mod);
+
+	if (ssi_parent_mod)
+		mods |= 1 << rsnd_mod_id(ssi_parent_mod);
+
+	return mods;
 }
 
 u32 rsnd_ssi_multi_slaves_runtime(struct rsnd_dai_stream *io)





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]