On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 9:48 PM, Greg KH <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 09:40:27PM +0100, Greg KH wrote:
>> On Tue, Dec 12, 2017 at 05:42:31PM +0100, Christoffer Dall wrote:
>> > From: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> >
>> > Commit 64afe6e9eb4841f35317da4393de21a047a883b3 upstream.
>> >
>> > The current pending table parsing code assumes that we keep the
>> > previous read of the pending bits, but keep that variable in
>> > the current block, making sure it is discarded on each loop.
>> >
>> > We end-up using whatever is on the stack. Who knows, it might
>> > just be the right thing...
>> >
>> > Fixes: 33d3bc9556a7d ("KVM: arm64: vgic-its: Read initial LPI pending table")
>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.8
>> > Reported-by: AKASHI Takahiro <takahiro.akashi@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Reviewed-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@xxxxxxx>
>> > Signed-off-by: Christoffer Dall <christoffer.dall@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> > virt/kvm/arm/vgic/vgic-its.c | 2 +-
>> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> All 4 backports queued up, many thanks for them.
>
> Hm, no, I messed up. I'm totally confused by the emails you sent and
> the "drop this" and "this is real" :)
>
Yeah, I had a bad day. Sorry about the confusion.
> Can you resend just the patches you want applied?
>
Yes, all four incoming now.
Thanks!
-Christoffer