Re: stable-request: bpf 2017-12-12

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 03:38:01PM +0100, Daniel Borkmann wrote:
> Hi Greg,
> 
> It would be great if you could cherry-pick the following BPF related
> commit into stable trees:
> 
>   c131187db2d3 ("bpf: fix branch pruning logic")  -  up to 4.9
> 
>   Instructions for 4.14:
> 
>     There's a minor conflict in verifier.c, just take the
>     'env->insn_aux_data[insn_idx].seen = true;' part from
>     the patch.
> 
>   Instructions for 4.9:
> 
>     Needs 8041902dae52 ("bpf: adjust insn_aux_data when patching
>     insns") as prerequisite. Same minor conflict in verifier.c
>     as with 4.14 described above. The minor one in bpf_verifier.h
>     for struct bpf_insn_aux_data should be resolved by having
>     'ptr_type' and 'seen' as final members of the struct.

Can you just provide patches that you backported and verified to be
correct?  That ensures I don't mess it up :)

thanks,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]