On Wed, Dec 13, 2017 at 01:05:49PM +0000, Chris Wilson wrote:
> Quoting Daniel Vetter (2017-12-13 12:49:36)
> > PROBE_DEFER also uses system_wq to reprobe drivers, which means when
> > that again fails, and we try to flush the overall system_wq (to get
> > all the delayed connectore cleanup work_struct completed), we
> > deadlock.
> >
> > Fix this by using just a single cleanup work, so that we can only
> > flush that one and don't block on anything else. That means a free
> > list plus locking, a standard pattern.
> >
> > v2:
> > - Correctly free connectors only on last ref. Oops (Chris).
> > - use llist_head/node (Chris).
> >
> > Fixes: a703c55004e1 ("drm: safely free connectors from connector_iter")
> > Fixes: 613051dac40d ("drm: locking&new iterators for connector_list")
> > Cc: Ben Widawsky <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Dave Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Sean Paul <seanpaul@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.11+: 613051dac40d ("drm: locking&new iterators for connector_list"
> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # v4.11+
> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Jani Nikula <jani.nikula@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Gustavo Padovan <gustavo@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Javier Martinez Canillas <javier@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Shuah Khan <shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Guillaume Tucker <guillaume.tucker@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Kevin Hilman <khilman@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Matt Hart <matthew.hart@xxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Thierry Escande <thierry.escande@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Tomeu Vizoso <tomeu.vizoso@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Cc: Enric Balletbo i Serra <enric.balletbo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxxx>
> > ---
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c | 50 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----------
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h | 1 +
> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c | 4 ++-
> > include/drm/drm_connector.h | 10 +++++---
> > include/drm/drm_mode_config.h | 18 ++++++++++++-
> > 5 files changed, 62 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> > index 0b7e0974e6da..3f53f127e1f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_connector.c
> > @@ -153,14 +153,23 @@ static void drm_connector_free(struct kref *kref)
> > connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
> > }
> >
> > -static void drm_connector_free_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > +void drm_connector_free_work_fn(struct work_struct *work)
> > {
> > - struct drm_connector *connector =
> > - container_of(work, struct drm_connector, free_work);
> > - struct drm_device *dev = connector->dev;
> > + struct drm_connector *connector, *n;
> > + struct drm_device *dev =
> > + container_of(work, struct drm_device, mode_config.connector_free_work);
> > + struct drm_mode_config *config = &dev->mode_config;
> > + unsigned long flags;
> > + struct llist_node *freed;
> >
> > - drm_mode_object_unregister(dev, &connector->base);
> > - connector->funcs->destroy(connector);
> > + spin_lock_irqsave(&config->connector_list_lock, flags);
> > + freed = llist_del_all(&config->connector_free_list);
> > + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&config->connector_list_lock, flags);
>
> My understanding is that the spinlock here is only used to guard the
> free_list. (It's not protecting the final refcount.) In which case it is
> redundant as llist_del_all/llist_add are a safe lockless combination.
>
> That just makes the patch bigger than has to be, but it looks correct.
>
> > +__drm_connector_put_safe(struct drm_connector *conn)
> > {
> > - if (refcount_dec_and_test(&conn->base.refcount.refcount))
> > - schedule_work(&conn->free_work);
> > + struct drm_mode_config *config = &conn->dev->mode_config;
> > +
> > + lockdep_assert_held(&config->connector_list_lock);
> > +
> > + if (!refcount_dec_and_test(&conn->base.refcount.refcount))
> > + return;
> > +
> > + llist_add(&conn->free_node, &config->connector_free_list);
> > + schedule_work(&config->connector_free_work);
>
> (Didn't like the if (llist_add) nano-optimisation? :)
I thought that one might race, since the schedule_work is what provides the
crucial barrier here. But then I was kinda too lazy to read all the llist
guarantees already and just figured I'll keep the spin_lock stuck around
everything.
But yeah it's all neatly lockless, now I'm tempted to redo it all. If CI
spots something I'll include it in the respin for sure.
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h
> > index 9ebb8841778c..af00f42ba269 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_crtc_internal.h
> > @@ -142,6 +142,7 @@ int drm_mode_connector_set_obj_prop(struct drm_mode_object *obj,
> > uint64_t value);
> > int drm_connector_create_standard_properties(struct drm_device *dev);
> > const char *drm_get_connector_force_name(enum drm_connector_force force);
> > +void drm_connector_free_work_fn(struct work_struct *work);
> >
> > /* IOCTL */
> > int drm_mode_connector_property_set_ioctl(struct drm_device *dev,
> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> > index 6ffe952142e6..7681269abe41 100644
> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_mode_config.c
> > @@ -382,6 +382,8 @@ void drm_mode_config_init(struct drm_device *dev)
> > ida_init(&dev->mode_config.connector_ida);
> > spin_lock_init(&dev->mode_config.connector_list_lock);
> >
> > + INIT_WORK(&dev->mode_config.connector_free_work, drm_connector_free_work_fn);
>
> A init_llist_head(&dev->mode_config.connector_free_list) wouldn't go
> amiss here. So perhaps push the connectors init into its own exported
> function from drm_connector.c as opposed to exposing the free_fn.
Imo it doesn't matter much how we go about drm.ko internals. But I'll
stick the init_llist_head in there when applying, somehow I dind't find it
(why is every kernel data type slightly different in this).
> Reviewed-by: Chris Wilson <chris@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Thanks, Daniel
--
Daniel Vetter
Software Engineer, Intel Corporation
http://blog.ffwll.ch