This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ibmvnic-allocate-number-of-rx-tx-buffers-agreed-on-by-firmware.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Dec 12 13:26:17 CET 2017
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2017 12:18:42 -0600
Subject: ibmvnic: Allocate number of rx/tx buffers agreed on by firmware
From: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 068d9f90a6978c3e3a662d9e85204a7d6be240d2 ]
The amount of TX/RX buffers that the vNIC driver currently allocates
is different from the amount agreed upon in negotiation with firmware.
Correct that by allocating the requested number of buffers confirmed
by firmware.
Signed-off-by: Thomas Falcon <tlfalcon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c | 16 ++++++++--------
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/ibm/ibmvnic.c
@@ -404,7 +404,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic
send_map_query(adapter);
for (i = 0; i < rxadd_subcrqs; i++) {
init_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i],
- IBMVNIC_BUFFS_PER_POOL, i,
+ adapter->req_rx_add_entries_per_subcrq, i,
be64_to_cpu(size_array[i]), 1);
if (alloc_rx_pool(adapter, &adapter->rx_pool[i])) {
dev_err(dev, "Couldn't alloc rx pool\n");
@@ -419,23 +419,23 @@ static int ibmvnic_open(struct net_devic
for (i = 0; i < tx_subcrqs; i++) {
tx_pool = &adapter->tx_pool[i];
tx_pool->tx_buff =
- kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
+ kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
sizeof(struct ibmvnic_tx_buff), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx_pool->tx_buff)
goto tx_pool_alloc_failed;
if (alloc_long_term_buff(adapter, &tx_pool->long_term_buff,
- adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq *
+ adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq *
adapter->req_mtu))
goto tx_ltb_alloc_failed;
tx_pool->free_map =
- kcalloc(adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
+ kcalloc(adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq,
sizeof(int), GFP_KERNEL);
if (!tx_pool->free_map)
goto tx_fm_alloc_failed;
- for (j = 0; j < adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++)
+ for (j = 0; j < adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq; j++)
tx_pool->free_map[j] = j;
tx_pool->consumer_index = 0;
@@ -746,7 +746,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff *
tx_pool->consumer_index =
(tx_pool->consumer_index + 1) %
- adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
+ adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
tx_buff = &tx_pool->tx_buff[index];
tx_buff->skb = skb;
@@ -819,7 +819,7 @@ static int ibmvnic_xmit(struct sk_buff *
if (tx_pool->consumer_index == 0)
tx_pool->consumer_index =
- adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1;
+ adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq - 1;
else
tx_pool->consumer_index--;
@@ -1400,7 +1400,7 @@ restart_loop:
producer_index] = index;
adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index =
(adapter->tx_pool[pool].producer_index + 1) %
- adapter->max_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
+ adapter->req_tx_entries_per_subcrq;
}
/* remove tx_comp scrq*/
next->tx_comp.first = 0;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from tlfalcon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/ibmvnic-allocate-number-of-rx-tx-buffers-agreed-on-by-firmware.patch
queue-4.9/ibmvnic-fix-overflowing-firmware-hardware-tx-queue.patch