Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 7 Dec 2017 21:06:05 +0100
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx, shuahkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, patches@xxxxxxxxxxxx, ben.hutchings@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, lkft-triage@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
In-reply-to: <20171207152359.GA21971@flashbox>
User-agent: Mutt/1.9.1 (2017-09-22)

On Thu, Dec 07, 2017 at 08:23:59AM -0700, Nathan Chancellor wrote:
> Merged, compiled, and flashed on my Pixel 2 XL and OnePlus 5.
> 
> No initial issues noticed in general usage or dmesg.

Thanks for the testing and letting me know.

greg k-h

References:
- [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review
  - From: Greg Kroah-Hartman
- Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review
  - From: Nathan Chancellor

Prev by Date: Re: [PATCH 4.4 71/96] e1000e: Separate signaling for link check/link up
Next by Date: Re: [PATCH 4.4 78/96] drm/armada: Fix compile fail
Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review
Next by thread: Re: [PATCH 4.4 00/49] 4.4.105-stable review
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel] [Kernel Development Newbies] [Linux USB Devel] [Video for Linux] [Linux Audio Users] [Yosemite Hiking] [Linux Kernel] [Linux SCSI]