This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled sysrq : fix Show Regs call trace on ARM to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: sysrq-fix-show-regs-call-trace-on-arm.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Wed Dec 6 17:39:55 CET 2017 From: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Sun, 10 Sep 2017 20:11:42 -0700 Subject: sysrq : fix Show Regs call trace on ARM From: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit b00bebbc301c8e1f74f230dc82282e56b7e7a6db ] When kernel configuration SMP,PREEMPT and DEBUG_PREEMPT are enabled, echo 1 >/proc/sys/kernel/sysrq echo p >/proc/sysrq-trigger kernel will print call trace as below: sysrq: SysRq : Show Regs BUG: using __this_cpu_read() in preemptible [00000000] code: sh/435 caller is __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x18/0x20 Call trace: [<ffffff8008088e80>] dump_backtrace+0x0/0x1d0 [<ffffff8008089074>] show_stack+0x24/0x30 [<ffffff8008447970>] dump_stack+0x90/0xb0 [<ffffff8008463950>] check_preemption_disabled+0x100/0x108 [<ffffff8008463998>] __this_cpu_preempt_check+0x18/0x20 [<ffffff80084c9194>] sysrq_handle_showregs+0x1c/0x40 [<ffffff80084c9c7c>] __handle_sysrq+0x12c/0x1a0 [<ffffff80084ca140>] write_sysrq_trigger+0x60/0x70 [<ffffff8008251e00>] proc_reg_write+0x90/0xd0 [<ffffff80081f1788>] __vfs_write+0x48/0x90 [<ffffff80081f241c>] vfs_write+0xa4/0x190 [<ffffff80081f3354>] SyS_write+0x54/0xb0 [<ffffff80080833f0>] el0_svc_naked+0x24/0x28 This can be seen on a common board like an r-pi3. This happens because when echo p >/proc/sysrq-trigger, get_irq_regs() is called outside of IRQ context, if preemption is enabled in this situation,kernel will print the call trace. Since many prior discussions on the mailing lists have made it clear that get_irq_regs either just returns NULL or stale data when used outside of IRQ context,we simply avoid calling it outside of IRQ context. Signed-off-by: Jibin Xu <jibin.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/tty/sysrq.c | 9 +++++++-- 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/tty/sysrq.c +++ b/drivers/tty/sysrq.c @@ -243,8 +243,10 @@ static void sysrq_handle_showallcpus(int * architecture has no support for it: */ if (!trigger_all_cpu_backtrace()) { - struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); + struct pt_regs *regs = NULL; + if (in_irq()) + regs = get_irq_regs(); if (regs) { pr_info("CPU%d:\n", smp_processor_id()); show_regs(regs); @@ -263,7 +265,10 @@ static struct sysrq_key_op sysrq_showall static void sysrq_handle_showregs(int key) { - struct pt_regs *regs = get_irq_regs(); + struct pt_regs *regs = NULL; + + if (in_irq()) + regs = get_irq_regs(); if (regs) show_regs(regs); perf_event_print_debug(); Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from jibin.xu@xxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.9/sysrq-fix-show-regs-call-trace-on-arm.patch