4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit dc3033e16c59a2c4e62b31341258a5786cbcee56 upstream.
lockd_up() can call lockd_unregister_notifiers twice:
inside lockd_start_svc() when it calls lockd_svc_exit_thread()
and then in error path of lockd_up()
Patch forces lockd_start_svc() to unregister notifiers in all error cases
and removes extra unregister in error path of lockd_up().
Fixes: cb7d224f82e4 "lockd: unregister notifier blocks if the service ..."
Signed-off-by: Vasily Averin <vvs@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: J. Bruce Fields <bfields@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/lockd/svc.c | 20 +++++++++-----------
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/lockd/svc.c
+++ b/fs/lockd/svc.c
@@ -365,6 +365,7 @@ static int lockd_start_svc(struct svc_se
printk(KERN_WARNING
"lockd_up: svc_rqst allocation failed, error=%d\n",
error);
+ lockd_unregister_notifiers();
goto out_rqst;
}
@@ -455,13 +456,16 @@ int lockd_up(struct net *net)
}
error = lockd_up_net(serv, net);
- if (error < 0)
- goto err_net;
+ if (error < 0) {
+ lockd_unregister_notifiers();
+ goto err_put;
+ }
error = lockd_start_svc(serv);
- if (error < 0)
- goto err_start;
-
+ if (error < 0) {
+ lockd_down_net(serv, net);
+ goto err_put;
+ }
nlmsvc_users++;
/*
* Note: svc_serv structures have an initial use count of 1,
@@ -472,12 +476,6 @@ err_put:
err_create:
mutex_unlock(&nlmsvc_mutex);
return error;
-
-err_start:
- lockd_down_net(serv, net);
-err_net:
- lockd_unregister_notifiers();
- goto err_put;
}
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(lockd_up);