This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
bnxt_en: Set default completion ring for async events.
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
bnxt_en-set-default-completion-ring-for-async-events.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Nov 28 10:49:28 CET 2017
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2016 12:13:42 -0500
Subject: bnxt_en: Set default completion ring for async events.
From: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 486b5c22ea1d35e00e90dd79a32a9ee530b18915 ]
With the added support for the bnxt_re RDMA driver, both drivers can be
allocating completion rings in any order. The firmware does not know
which completion ring should be receiving async events. Add an
extra step to tell firmware the completion ring number for receiving
async events after bnxt_en allocates the completion rings.
Signed-off-by: Michael Chan <michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/broadcom/bnxt/bnxt.c
@@ -3800,6 +3800,30 @@ static int hwrm_ring_alloc_send_msg(stru
return rc;
}
+static int bnxt_hwrm_set_async_event_cr(struct bnxt *bp, int idx)
+{
+ int rc;
+
+ if (BNXT_PF(bp)) {
+ struct hwrm_func_cfg_input req = {0};
+
+ bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_CFG, -1, -1);
+ req.fid = cpu_to_le16(0xffff);
+ req.enables = cpu_to_le32(FUNC_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_ASYNC_EVENT_CR);
+ req.async_event_cr = cpu_to_le16(idx);
+ rc = hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+ } else {
+ struct hwrm_func_vf_cfg_input req = {0};
+
+ bnxt_hwrm_cmd_hdr_init(bp, &req, HWRM_FUNC_VF_CFG, -1, -1);
+ req.enables =
+ cpu_to_le32(FUNC_VF_CFG_REQ_ENABLES_ASYNC_EVENT_CR);
+ req.async_event_cr = cpu_to_le16(idx);
+ rc = hwrm_send_message(bp, &req, sizeof(req), HWRM_CMD_TIMEOUT);
+ }
+ return rc;
+}
+
static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_alloc(struct bnxt *bp)
{
int i, rc = 0;
@@ -3816,6 +3840,12 @@ static int bnxt_hwrm_ring_alloc(struct b
goto err_out;
BNXT_CP_DB(cpr->cp_doorbell, cpr->cp_raw_cons);
bp->grp_info[i].cp_fw_ring_id = ring->fw_ring_id;
+
+ if (!i) {
+ rc = bnxt_hwrm_set_async_event_cr(bp, ring->fw_ring_id);
+ if (rc)
+ netdev_warn(bp->dev, "Failed to set async event completion ring.\n");
+ }
}
for (i = 0; i < bp->tx_nr_rings; i++) {
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from michael.chan@xxxxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/bnxt_en-set-default-completion-ring-for-async-events.patch