Re: Towards 4.14 LTS

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



> On Nov 19, 2017, at 5:20 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 10:50:23PM -0600, Tom Gall wrote:
>> At Linaro we’ve been putting effort into regularly running kernel tests over 
>> arm, arm64 and x86_64 targets. On those targets we’re running mainline, -next, 
>> 4.4, and 4.9 kernels and yes we are adding to this list as the hardware 
>> capacity grows.
>> 
>> For test buckets we’re using just LTP, kselftest and libhugetlbfs and
>> like kernels we will add to this list. 
> 
> I'm sorry, I don't understand this sentance.

I was just saying that we intend to add more test buckets and more kernels.

For instance 4.13-rc just was added to the mix.

For test buckets, I’m currently dorking around with some make check targets
for a few interesting packages. 

> 
>> With the 4.14 cycle being a little ‘different’ in so much as the goal to 
>> have it be an LTS kernel I think it’s important to take a look at some 
>> 4.14 test results. 
>> 
>> Grab a beverage, this is a bit of a long post. But quick summery 4.14 as 
>> released looks just as good as 4.13, for the test buckets I named above.
> 
> Thanks for doing this testing and letting us know.
> 
> greg k-h





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]