4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Hannu Lounento <hannu.lounento@xxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 76ed5a8f47476e4984cc8c0c1bc4cee62650f7fd ]
Fix an if statement with hw_dbg lines where the logic was inverted with
regards to the corresponding return value used in the if statement.
Signed-off-by: Hannu Lounento <hannu.lounento@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Peter Senna Tschudin <peter.senna@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Aaron Brown <aaron.f.brown@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c | 4 ++--
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c
+++ b/drivers/net/ethernet/intel/igb/e1000_i210.c
@@ -699,9 +699,9 @@ static s32 igb_update_flash_i210(struct
ret_val = igb_pool_flash_update_done_i210(hw);
if (ret_val)
- hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n");
- else
hw_dbg("Flash update time out\n");
+ else
+ hw_dbg("Flash update complete\n");
out:
return ret_val;