On Thu, Nov 16, 2017 at 03:19:35PM +0100, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> 2017-10-30 10:19 GMT+01:00 Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>:
> > On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 11:01:32AM +0200, Benjamin Gaignard wrote:
> >> 2017-10-23 17:25 GMT+02:00 Ville Syrjala <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>:
> >> > From: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> >
> >> > Since commit 632c6e4edef1 ("drm/vblank: Fix flip event vblank count")
> >> > even drivers that don't implement accurate vblank timestamps will end
> >> > up using drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(). That leads to a WARN every
> >> > time drm_crtc_arm_vblank_event() gets called. The could be as often
> >> > as every frame for each active crtc.
> >> >
> >> > Considering drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count() is never any worse than
> >> > the drm_vblank_count() we used previously, let's just skip the WARN
> >> > unless DRM_UT_VBL is enabled. That way people won't be bothered by
> >> > this unless they're debugging vblank code. And let's also change it
> >> > to WARN_ONCE() so that even when you're debugging vblank code you
> >> > won't get drowned by constant WARNs.
> >> >
> >> > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> >> > Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@xxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: "Szyprowski, Marek" <m.szyprowski@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Cc: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Reported-by: Andrzej Hajda <a.hajda@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> >> > Fixes: 632c6e4edef1 ("drm/vblank: Fix flip event vblank count")
> >> > Signed-off-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> I have tested it on sti and stm driver, it fix the problem, thanks.
> >>
> >> Acked-by: Benjamin Gaignard <benjamin.gaignard@xxxxxxxxxx>
> >>
> >> > ---
> >> > drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c | 4 ++--
> >> > 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> >> >
> >> > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> >> > index 13722c373a6a..c81c297995c6 100644
> >> > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> >> > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/drm_vblank.c
> >> > @@ -299,8 +299,8 @@ u32 drm_crtc_accurate_vblank_count(struct drm_crtc *crtc)
> >> > u32 vblank;
> >> > unsigned long flags;
> >> >
> >> > - WARN(!dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp,
> >> > - "This function requires support for accurate vblank timestamps.");
> >> > + WARN_ONCE(drm_debug & DRM_UT_VBL && !dev->driver->get_vblank_timestamp,
> >> > + "This function requires support for accurate vblank timestamps.");
> >
> > Somewhat a bikeshed, but if we e.g. enable debugging in a CI or piglit
> > run, then this could change the results. I'd go with a if ()
> > DRM_DEBUG_VBLANK. Either way:
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@xxxxxxxx>
> >
>
> Does something is missing to merge this fix in drm-misc ?
> Without it I got warning at each frame.
Pushed... 9 days ago it seems.
--
Ville Syrjälä
Intel OTC