4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 8b649e426336d7d4800ff9c82858328f4215ba01 ]
The pinmux configuration in device tree was different from manual
muxing in <u-boot>/board/freescale/mx53loco/mx53loco.c
All pins were configured as NO_PAD_CTL(1 << 31), which was fine as the
bootloader already did the correct pinmuxing for us.
But recently u-boot is migrating to reuse device tree files from the
kernel tree, so it seems to be better to have the correct pinmuxing in
our files, too.
Signed-off-by: Patrick Bruenn <p.bruenn@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo <shawnguo@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-qsb-common.dtsi | 20 ++++++++++----------
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-qsb-common.dtsi
+++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/imx53-qsb-common.dtsi
@@ -215,16 +215,16 @@
pinctrl_fec: fecgrp {
fsl,pins = <
- MX53_PAD_FEC_MDC__FEC_MDC 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_MDIO__FEC_MDIO 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_REF_CLK__FEC_TX_CLK 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_RX_ER__FEC_RX_ER 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_CRS_DV__FEC_RX_DV 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_RXD1__FEC_RDATA_1 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_RXD0__FEC_RDATA_0 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_TX_EN__FEC_TX_EN 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_TXD1__FEC_TDATA_1 0x80000000
- MX53_PAD_FEC_TXD0__FEC_TDATA_0 0x80000000
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_MDC__FEC_MDC 0x4
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_MDIO__FEC_MDIO 0x1fc
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_REF_CLK__FEC_TX_CLK 0x180
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_RX_ER__FEC_RX_ER 0x180
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_CRS_DV__FEC_RX_DV 0x180
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_RXD1__FEC_RDATA_1 0x180
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_RXD0__FEC_RDATA_0 0x180
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_TX_EN__FEC_TX_EN 0x4
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_TXD1__FEC_TDATA_1 0x4
+ MX53_PAD_FEC_TXD0__FEC_TDATA_0 0x4
>;
};