On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 09:27:49AM +0100, Maarten Lankhorst wrote: > Op 05-11-17 om 16:15 schreef gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx: > > The patch below does not apply to the 4.9-stable tree. > > If someone wants it applied there, or to any other stable or longterm > > tree, then please email the backport, including the original git commit > > id to <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>. > > > > thanks, > > > > greg k-h > > > ------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------ > > > > From 8777b927b92cf5b6c29f9f9d3c737addea9ac8a7 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 > > From: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Date: Thu, 19 Oct 2017 17:13:40 +0200 > > Subject: [PATCH] drm/i915: Do not rely on wm preservation for ILK watermarks > > MIME-Version: 1.0 > > Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 > > Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit > > > > The original intent was to preserve watermarks as much as possible > > in intel_pipe_wm.raw_wm, and put the validated ones in intel_pipe_wm.wm. > > > > It seems this approach is insufficient and we don't always preserve > > the raw watermarks, so just use the atomic iterator we're already using > > to get a const pointer to all bound planes on the crtc. > > > > Bugzilla: https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=102373 > > Signed-off-by: Maarten Lankhorst <maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx #v4.8+ > > Acked-by: Ville Syrjälä <ville.syrjala@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@xxxxxxxxx> > > Link: https://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20171019151341.4579-1-maarten.lankhorst@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > > (cherry picked from commit 28283f4f359cd7cfa9e65457bb98c507a2cd0cd0) > > Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > index fa47285918f4..79fbaf78f604 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_drv.h > > @@ -496,7 +496,6 @@ struct intel_crtc_scaler_state { > > > > struct intel_pipe_wm { > > struct intel_wm_level wm[5]; > > - struct intel_wm_level raw_wm[5]; > > uint32_t linetime; > > bool fbc_wm_enabled; > > bool pipe_enabled; > > diff --git a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > index 0a09f8ff6aff..cb950752c346 100644 > > --- a/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > +++ b/drivers/gpu/drm/i915/intel_pm.c > > @@ -2716,9 +2716,9 @@ static void ilk_compute_wm_level(const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv, > > const struct intel_crtc *intel_crtc, > > int level, > > struct intel_crtc_state *cstate, > > - struct intel_plane_state *pristate, > > - struct intel_plane_state *sprstate, > > - struct intel_plane_state *curstate, > > + const struct intel_plane_state *pristate, > > + const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate, > > + const struct intel_plane_state *curstate, > > struct intel_wm_level *result) > > { > > uint16_t pri_latency = dev_priv->wm.pri_latency[level]; > > @@ -3038,28 +3038,24 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) > > struct intel_pipe_wm *pipe_wm; > > struct drm_device *dev = state->dev; > > const struct drm_i915_private *dev_priv = to_i915(dev); > > - struct intel_plane *intel_plane; > > - struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL; > > - struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL; > > - struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL; > > + struct drm_plane *plane; > > + const struct drm_plane_state *plane_state; > > + const struct intel_plane_state *pristate = NULL; > > + const struct intel_plane_state *sprstate = NULL; > > + const struct intel_plane_state *curstate = NULL; > > int level, max_level = ilk_wm_max_level(dev_priv), usable_level; > > struct ilk_wm_maximums max; > > > > pipe_wm = &cstate->wm.ilk.optimal; > > > > - for_each_intel_plane_on_crtc(dev, intel_crtc, intel_plane) { > > - struct intel_plane_state *ps; > > - > > - ps = intel_atomic_get_existing_plane_state(state, > > - intel_plane); > > - if (!ps) > > - continue; > > + drm_atomic_crtc_state_for_each_plane_state(plane, plane_state, &cstate->base) { > > + const struct intel_plane_state *ps = to_intel_plane_state(plane_state); > > > > - if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) > > + if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_PRIMARY) > > pristate = ps; > > - else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY) > > + else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_OVERLAY) > > sprstate = ps; > > - else if (intel_plane->base.type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) > > + else if (plane->type == DRM_PLANE_TYPE_CURSOR) > > curstate = ps; > > } > > > > @@ -3081,11 +3077,9 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) > > if (pipe_wm->sprites_scaled) > > usable_level = 0; > > > > - ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate, > > - pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]); > > - > > memset(&pipe_wm->wm, 0, sizeof(pipe_wm->wm)); > > - pipe_wm->wm[0] = pipe_wm->raw_wm[0]; > > + ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, 0, cstate, > > + pristate, sprstate, curstate, &pipe_wm->wm[0]); > > > > if (IS_HASWELL(dev_priv) || IS_BROADWELL(dev_priv)) > > pipe_wm->linetime = hsw_compute_linetime_wm(cstate); > > @@ -3095,8 +3089,8 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) > > > > ilk_compute_wm_reg_maximums(dev_priv, 1, &max); > > > > - for (level = 1; level <= max_level; level++) { > > - struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->raw_wm[level]; > > + for (level = 1; level <= usable_level; level++) { > > + struct intel_wm_level *wm = &pipe_wm->wm[level]; > > > > ilk_compute_wm_level(dev_priv, intel_crtc, level, cstate, > > pristate, sprstate, curstate, wm); > > @@ -3106,13 +3100,10 @@ static int ilk_compute_pipe_wm(struct intel_crtc_state *cstate) > > * register maximums since such watermarks are > > * always invalid. > > */ > > - if (level > usable_level) > > - continue; > > - > > - if (ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) > > - pipe_wm->wm[level] = *wm; > > - else > > - usable_level = level; > > + if (!ilk_validate_wm_level(level, &max, wm)) { > > + memset(wm, 0, sizeof(*wm)); > > + break; > > + } > > } > > > > return 0; > > > Is this backport good? > I care about this patch and the followup patch, since it fixes a problem > some v4.9 users experience. Now applied thanks. What is the "followup patch" that I should also apply to the 4.9-stable tree? thanks, greg k-h