This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled s390/qeth: fix retrieval of vipa and proxy-arp addresses to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at: http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary The filename of the patch is: s390-qeth-fix-retrieval-of-vipa-and-proxy-arp-addresses.patch and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory. If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree, please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it. >From foo@baz Thu Nov 9 09:48:01 CET 2017 From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Date: Thu, 12 Jan 2017 15:48:43 +0100 Subject: s390/qeth: fix retrieval of vipa and proxy-arp addresses From: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> [ Upstream commit e48b9eaaa29a0a7d5da2df136b07eefa0180d584 ] qeth devices in layer3 mode need a separate handling of vipa and proxy-arp addresses. vipa and proxy-arp addresses processed by qeth can be read from userspace. Introduced with commit 5f78e29ceebf ("qeth: optimize IP handling in rx_mode callback") the retrieval of vipa and proxy-arp addresses is broken, if more than one vipa or proxy-arp address are set. The qeth code used local variable "int i" for 2 different purposes. This patch now spends 2 separate local variables of type "int". While touching these functions hash_for_each_safe() is converted to hash_for_each(), since there is no removal of hash entries. Signed-off-by: Ursula Braun <ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reviewed-by: Julian Wiedmann <jwi@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Reference-ID: RQM 3524 Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c | 30 ++++++++++++++++-------------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c +++ b/drivers/s390/net/qeth_l3_sys.c @@ -692,15 +692,15 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_vipa_add_show enum qeth_prot_versions proto) { struct qeth_ipaddr *ipaddr; - struct hlist_node *tmp; char addr_str[40]; + int str_len = 0; int entry_len; /* length of 1 entry string, differs between v4 and v6 */ - int i = 0; + int i; entry_len = (proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)? 12 : 40; entry_len += 2; /* \n + terminator */ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock); - hash_for_each_safe(card->ip_htable, i, tmp, ipaddr, hnode) { + hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, ipaddr, hnode) { if (ipaddr->proto != proto) continue; if (ipaddr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_VIPA) @@ -708,16 +708,17 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_vipa_add_show /* String must not be longer than PAGE_SIZE. So we check if * string length gets near PAGE_SIZE. Then we can savely display * the next IPv6 address (worst case, compared to IPv4) */ - if ((PAGE_SIZE - i) <= entry_len) + if ((PAGE_SIZE - str_len) <= entry_len) break; qeth_l3_ipaddr_to_string(proto, (const u8 *)&ipaddr->u, addr_str); - i += snprintf(buf + i, PAGE_SIZE - i, "%s\n", addr_str); + str_len += snprintf(buf + str_len, PAGE_SIZE - str_len, "%s\n", + addr_str); } spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock); - i += snprintf(buf + i, PAGE_SIZE - i, "\n"); + str_len += snprintf(buf + str_len, PAGE_SIZE - str_len, "\n"); - return i; + return str_len; } static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_vipa_add4_show(struct device *dev, @@ -854,15 +855,15 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_rxip_add_show enum qeth_prot_versions proto) { struct qeth_ipaddr *ipaddr; - struct hlist_node *tmp; char addr_str[40]; + int str_len = 0; int entry_len; /* length of 1 entry string, differs between v4 and v6 */ - int i = 0; + int i; entry_len = (proto == QETH_PROT_IPV4)? 12 : 40; entry_len += 2; /* \n + terminator */ spin_lock_bh(&card->ip_lock); - hash_for_each_safe(card->ip_htable, i, tmp, ipaddr, hnode) { + hash_for_each(card->ip_htable, i, ipaddr, hnode) { if (ipaddr->proto != proto) continue; if (ipaddr->type != QETH_IP_TYPE_RXIP) @@ -870,16 +871,17 @@ static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_rxip_add_show /* String must not be longer than PAGE_SIZE. So we check if * string length gets near PAGE_SIZE. Then we can savely display * the next IPv6 address (worst case, compared to IPv4) */ - if ((PAGE_SIZE - i) <= entry_len) + if ((PAGE_SIZE - str_len) <= entry_len) break; qeth_l3_ipaddr_to_string(proto, (const u8 *)&ipaddr->u, addr_str); - i += snprintf(buf + i, PAGE_SIZE - i, "%s\n", addr_str); + str_len += snprintf(buf + str_len, PAGE_SIZE - str_len, "%s\n", + addr_str); } spin_unlock_bh(&card->ip_lock); - i += snprintf(buf + i, PAGE_SIZE - i, "\n"); + str_len += snprintf(buf + str_len, PAGE_SIZE - str_len, "\n"); - return i; + return str_len; } static ssize_t qeth_l3_dev_rxip_add4_show(struct device *dev, Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ubraun@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx are queue-4.9/s390-qeth-fix-retrieval-of-vipa-and-proxy-arp-addresses.patch queue-4.9/s390-qeth-issue-startlan-as-first-ipa-command.patch