On Mon, Nov 06, 2017 at 06:19:46PM +0000, Levin, Alexander (Sasha Levin) wrote: > On Wed, Oct 25, 2017 at 10:06:36AM +0200, Mark Brown wrote: > >In general I would be extremely wary of backporting anything like this > >that affects things like device instantiation ordering, even without any > >knock on bugs directly in the code there's a good chance that someone > >building on stable is going to have some kind of dependency on the > >particular behaviour of the kernel version they're using and changes > >like this could cause updating to the latest stable to introduce > >problems which then discourages people from picking up stable. > On the other hand, we do want to be "bug compatible" with upstream, > if we force a stable release to behave in a broken way it'll be hard > later to move to a newer stable release. > I think that we'd rather pull in fixes than avoid breaking broken > behaviors. We're talking about existing stable releases that people are already using here, if it was .1 or whatever then sure but at .59 it's a bit late to be doing anything that risky.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature