4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 941f5f0f6ef5338814145cf2b813cf1f98873e2f upstream.
Commit 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for
/proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"") is not sufficient to restore the previous
behavior of "cpu MHz" in /proc/cpuinfo on x86 due to some changes
made after the commit it has reverted.
To address this, make the code in question use arch_freq_get_on_cpu()
which also is used by cpufreq for reporting the current frequency of
CPUs and since that function doesn't really depend on cpufreq in any
way, drop the CONFIG_CPU_FREQ dependency for the object file
containing it.
Also refactor arch_freq_get_on_cpu() somewhat to avoid IPIs and
return cached values right away if it is called very often over a
short time (to prevent user space from triggering IPI storms through
it).
Fixes: 890da9cf0983 (Revert "x86: do not use cpufreq_quick_get() for /proc/cpuinfo "cpu MHz"")
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile | 2 +-
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c | 11 +++++++----
arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c | 4 +++-
3 files changed, 11 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/Makefile
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@ obj-y += common.o
obj-y += rdrand.o
obj-y += match.o
obj-y += bugs.o
-obj-$(CONFIG_CPU_FREQ) += aperfmperf.o
+obj-y += aperfmperf.o
obj-$(CONFIG_PROC_FS) += proc.o
obj-$(CONFIG_X86_FEATURE_NAMES) += capflags.o powerflags.o
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/aperfmperf.c
@@ -42,10 +42,6 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
s64 time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(now, s->time);
unsigned long flags;
- /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
- if (time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
- return;
-
local_irq_save(flags);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_APERF, aperf);
rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MPERF, mperf);
@@ -74,6 +70,7 @@ static void aperfmperf_snapshot_khz(void
unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cpu)
{
+ s64 time_delta;
unsigned int khz;
if (!cpu_khz)
@@ -82,6 +79,12 @@ unsigned int arch_freq_get_on_cpu(int cp
if (!static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_APERFMPERF))
return 0;
+ /* Don't bother re-computing within the cache threshold time. */
+ time_delta = ktime_ms_delta(ktime_get(), per_cpu(samples.time, cpu));
+ khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
+ if (khz && time_delta < APERFMPERF_CACHE_THRESHOLD_MS)
+ return khz;
+
smp_call_function_single(cpu, aperfmperf_snapshot_khz, NULL, 1);
khz = per_cpu(samples.khz, cpu);
if (khz)
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/proc.c
@@ -77,9 +77,11 @@ static int show_cpuinfo(struct seq_file
seq_printf(m, "microcode\t: 0x%x\n", c->microcode);
if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_TSC)) {
- unsigned int freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
+ unsigned int freq = arch_freq_get_on_cpu(cpu);
if (!freq)
+ freq = cpufreq_quick_get(cpu);
+ if (!freq)
freq = cpu_khz;
seq_printf(m, "cpu MHz\t\t: %u.%03u\n",
freq / 1000, (freq % 1000));