Re: [PATCH 4.9.y 1/3] drm/bridge: adv7511: Rework adv7511_power_on/off() so they can be reused internally

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 03, 2017 at 10:10:26AM +0700, Nhan Nguyen wrote:
> From: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> 
> commit 651e4769ba2a9f20c4b8a823ae2727bf7fa9c9f0 upstream.
> 
> In chasing down issues with EDID probing, I found some
> duplicated but incomplete logic used to power the chip on and
> off.
> 
> This patch refactors the adv7511_power_on/off functions, so
> they can be used for internal needs.
> 
> Cc: David Airlie <airlied@xxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Wolfram Sang <wsa+renesas@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Cc: dri-devel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> Signed-off-by: John Stultz <john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Archit Taneja <architt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Thong Ho <thong.ho.px@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Nhan Nguyen <nhan.nguyen.yb@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1484614372-15342-5-git-send-email-john.stultz@xxxxxxxxxx
> ---
>  drivers/gpu/drm/bridge/adv7511/adv7511_drv.c | 15 +++++++++++----
>  1 file changed, 11 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)

Why are you asking for these 3 patches to be backported to the 4.9
stable tree?  What bugs are they fixing?  How do they meet the stable
kernel rules?

totally confused,

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]