Re: FAILED: patch "[PATCH] tracing/samples: Fix creation and deletion of" failed to apply to 4.9-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Below is the fix. The only conflict between 4.9 and Linus's tree was
that foo_bar_reg() changed from a void to returning int.

Also, I folded in Linus's fix of having simple_thread_cnt be int and
not bool. You can remove that if you want to add Linus's commit on top.

I'm guessing this should also work for 4.4 as well?

-- Steve

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From 6575257c60e1a26a5319ccf2b5ce5b6449001017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: "Steven Rostedt (VMware)" <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 Oct 2017 14:55:24 -0400
Subject: [PATCH] tracing/samples: Fix creation and deletion of
 simple_thread_fn creation

Commit 7496946a8 ("tracing: Add samples of DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() and
DEFINE_EVENT()") added template examples for all the events. It created a
DEFINE_EVENT_FN() example which reused the foo_bar_reg and foo_bar_unreg
functions.

Enabling both the TRACE_EVENT_FN() and DEFINE_EVENT_FN() example trace
events caused the foo_bar_reg to be called twice, creating the test thread
twice. The foo_bar_unreg would remove it only once, even if it was called
multiple times, leaving a thread existing when the module is unloaded,
causing an oops.

Add a ref count and allow foo_bar_reg() and foo_bar_unreg() be called by
multiple trace events.

Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 7496946a8 ("tracing: Add samples of DECLARE_EVENT_CLASS() and DEFINE_EVENT()")
Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Index: linux-trace.git/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
===================================================================
--- linux-trace.git.orig/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
+++ linux-trace.git/samples/trace_events/trace-events-sample.c
@@ -78,28 +78,36 @@ static int simple_thread_fn(void *arg)
 }
 
 static DEFINE_MUTEX(thread_mutex);
+static int simple_thread_cnt;
 
 void foo_bar_reg(void)
 {
+	mutex_lock(&thread_mutex);
+	if (simple_thread_cnt++)
+		goto out;
+
 	pr_info("Starting thread for foo_bar_fn\n");
 	/*
 	 * We shouldn't be able to start a trace when the module is
 	 * unloading (there's other locks to prevent that). But
 	 * for consistency sake, we still take the thread_mutex.
 	 */
-	mutex_lock(&thread_mutex);
 	simple_tsk_fn = kthread_run(simple_thread_fn, NULL, "event-sample-fn");
+ out:
 	mutex_unlock(&thread_mutex);
 }
 
 void foo_bar_unreg(void)
 {
-	pr_info("Killing thread for foo_bar_fn\n");
-	/* protect against module unloading */
 	mutex_lock(&thread_mutex);
+	if (--simple_thread_cnt)
+		goto out;
+
+	pr_info("Killing thread for foo_bar_fn\n");
 	if (simple_tsk_fn)
 		kthread_stop(simple_tsk_fn);
 	simple_tsk_fn = NULL;
+ out:
 	mutex_unlock(&thread_mutex);
 }
 



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]