3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 41a50d621a321b4c15273cc1b5ed41437f4acdfb upstream.
Before da413eec729d ("packet: Fixed TPACKET V3 to signal poll when block is
closed rather than every packet") poll listening for an af_packet socket was
not signaled if there was no packets to process. After the patch poll is
signaled evety time when block retire timer expires. That happens because
af_packet closes the current block on timeout even if the block is empty.
Passing empty blocks to the user not only wastes CPU but also wastes ring
buffer space increasing probability of packets dropping on small timeouts.
Signed-off-by: Alexander Drozdov <al.drozdov@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Dan Collins <dan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Willem de Bruijn <willemb@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guy Harris <guy@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Christoph Biedl <linux-kernel.bfrz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/packet/af_packet.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/packet/af_packet.c
+++ b/net/packet/af_packet.c
@@ -697,6 +697,10 @@ static void prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expi
if (pkc->last_kactive_blk_num == pkc->kactive_blk_num) {
if (!frozen) {
+ if (!BLOCK_NUM_PKTS(pbd)) {
+ /* An empty block. Just refresh the timer. */
+ goto refresh_timer;
+ }
prb_retire_current_block(pkc, po, TP_STATUS_BLK_TMO);
if (!prb_dispatch_next_block(pkc, po))
goto refresh_timer;
@@ -796,7 +800,11 @@ static void prb_close_block(struct tpack
h1->ts_last_pkt.ts_sec = last_pkt->tp_sec;
h1->ts_last_pkt.ts_nsec = last_pkt->tp_nsec;
} else {
- /* Ok, we tmo'd - so get the current time */
+ /* Ok, we tmo'd - so get the current time.
+ *
+ * It shouldn't really happen as we don't close empty
+ * blocks. See prb_retire_rx_blk_timer_expired().
+ */
struct timespec ts;
getnstimeofday(&ts);
h1->ts_last_pkt.ts_sec = ts.tv_sec;