4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 845d6524d69b40bd6abd61dc1264a8657159aa55 upstream.
Running CEC 1.4 compliance test we get the following error on test
11.1.6.2: "ERROR: The DUT did not broadcast a
<Report Physical Address> message to the unregistered device."
Fix this by letting GIVE_PHYSICAL_ADDR message respond to unregistered
device. Also, GIVE_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID and GIVE_FEATURES fall in the
same category so, respond also to these messages.
With this fix we pass CEC 1.4 official compliance.
Signed-off-by: Jose Abreu <joabreu@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joao Pinto <jpinto@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Hans Verkuil <hans.verkuil@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c | 13 ++++++++++---
1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
+++ b/drivers/media/cec/cec-adap.c
@@ -1726,12 +1726,19 @@ static int cec_receive_notify(struct cec
*/
switch (msg->msg[1]) {
case CEC_MSG_GET_CEC_VERSION:
- case CEC_MSG_GIVE_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID:
case CEC_MSG_ABORT:
case CEC_MSG_GIVE_DEVICE_POWER_STATUS:
- case CEC_MSG_GIVE_PHYSICAL_ADDR:
case CEC_MSG_GIVE_OSD_NAME:
+ /*
+ * These messages reply with a directed message, so ignore if
+ * the initiator is Unregistered.
+ */
+ if (!adap->passthrough && from_unregistered)
+ return 0;
+ /* Fall through */
+ case CEC_MSG_GIVE_DEVICE_VENDOR_ID:
case CEC_MSG_GIVE_FEATURES:
+ case CEC_MSG_GIVE_PHYSICAL_ADDR:
/*
* Skip processing these messages if the passthrough mode
* is on.
@@ -1739,7 +1746,7 @@ static int cec_receive_notify(struct cec
if (adap->passthrough)
goto skip_processing;
/* Ignore if addressing is wrong */
- if (is_broadcast || from_unregistered)
+ if (is_broadcast)
return 0;
break;