[PATCH 4.9 16/51] f2fs: do SSR for data when there is enough free space

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



4.9-stable review patch.  If anyone has any objections, please let me know.

------------------

From: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 035e97adab26c1121cedaeb9bd04cf48a8e8cf51 ]

In allocate_segment_by_default(), need_SSR() already detected it's time to do
SSR. So, let's try to find victims for data segments more aggressively in time.

Signed-off-by: Yunlong Song <yunlong.song@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/f2fs/segment.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/fs/f2fs/segment.c
+++ b/fs/f2fs/segment.c
@@ -1263,7 +1263,7 @@ static int get_ssr_segment(struct f2fs_s
 	struct curseg_info *curseg = CURSEG_I(sbi, type);
 	const struct victim_selection *v_ops = DIRTY_I(sbi)->v_ops;
 
-	if (IS_NODESEG(type) || !has_not_enough_free_secs(sbi, 0, 0))
+	if (IS_NODESEG(type))
 		return v_ops->get_victim(sbi,
 				&(curseg)->next_segno, BG_GC, type, SSR);
 





[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]