[PATCH 04/16] xfs: report zeroed or not correctly in xfs_zero_range()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



From: Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>

commit d20a5e3851969fa685f118a80e4df670255a4e8d upstream.

The 'did_zero' param of xfs_zero_range() was not passed to
iomap_zero_range() correctly. This was introduced by commit
7bb41db3ea16 ("xfs: handle 64-bit length in xfs_iozero"), and found
by code inspection.

Signed-off-by: Eryu Guan <eguan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Carlos Maiolino <cmaiolino@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@xxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c | 2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 586b398f268d..362c6b4c1186 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@ xfs_zero_range(
 	xfs_off_t		count,
 	bool			*did_zero)
 {
-	return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, NULL, &xfs_iomap_ops);
+	return iomap_zero_range(VFS_I(ip), pos, count, did_zero, &xfs_iomap_ops);
 }
 
 int
-- 
2.14.2




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]