4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 9af02d86e11dc409e5c3de46e81c0a492ba58905 ]
It's much the same as what we did for mwifiex in:
b9da4d2 mwifiex: avoid double-disable_irq() race
"We have a race where the wakeup IRQ might be in flight while we're
calling mwifiex_disable_wake() from resume(). This can leave us
disabling the IRQ twice.
Let's disable the IRQ and enable it in case if we have double-disabled
it."
Signed-off-by: Jeffy Chen <jeffy.chen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Brian Norris <briannorris@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Marcel Holtmann <marcel@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c | 8 ++++++--
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
+++ b/drivers/bluetooth/btmrvl_sdio.c
@@ -1682,8 +1682,12 @@ static int btmrvl_sdio_resume(struct dev
/* Disable platform specific wakeup interrupt */
if (card->plt_wake_cfg && card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt >= 0) {
disable_irq_wake(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
- if (!card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
- disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
+ disable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
+ if (card->plt_wake_cfg->wake_by_bt)
+ /* Undo our disable, since interrupt handler already
+ * did this.
+ */
+ enable_irq(card->plt_wake_cfg->irq_bt);
}
return 0;