This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
ocfs2/dlmglue: prepare tracking logic to avoid recursive cluster lock
to the 4.4-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
ocfs2-dlmglue-prepare-tracking-logic-to-avoid-recursive-cluster-lock.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.4 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Thu Oct 19 15:15:46 CEST 2017
From: Eric Ren <zren@xxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2017 15:40:41 -0800
Subject: ocfs2/dlmglue: prepare tracking logic to avoid recursive cluster lock
From: Eric Ren <zren@xxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 439a36b8ef38657f765b80b775e2885338d72451 ]
We are in the situation that we have to avoid recursive cluster locking,
but there is no way to check if a cluster lock has been taken by a precess
already.
Mostly, we can avoid recursive locking by writing code carefully.
However, we found that it's very hard to handle the routines that are
invoked directly by vfs code. For instance:
const struct inode_operations ocfs2_file_iops = {
.permission = ocfs2_permission,
.get_acl = ocfs2_iop_get_acl,
.set_acl = ocfs2_iop_set_acl,
};
Both ocfs2_permission() and ocfs2_iop_get_acl() call ocfs2_inode_lock(PR):
do_sys_open
may_open
inode_permission
ocfs2_permission
ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== first time
generic_permission
get_acl
ocfs2_iop_get_acl
ocfs2_inode_lock() <=== recursive one
A deadlock will occur if a remote EX request comes in between two of
ocfs2_inode_lock(). Briefly describe how the deadlock is formed:
On one hand, OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED flag of this lockres is set in
BAST(ocfs2_generic_handle_bast) when downconvert is started on behalf of
the remote EX lock request. Another hand, the recursive cluster lock
(the second one) will be blocked in in __ocfs2_cluster_lock() because of
OCFS2_LOCK_BLOCKED. But, the downconvert never complete, why? because
there is no chance for the first cluster lock on this node to be
unlocked - we block ourselves in the code path.
The idea to fix this issue is mostly taken from gfs2 code.
1. introduce a new field: struct ocfs2_lock_res.l_holders, to keep track
of the processes' pid who has taken the cluster lock of this lock
resource;
2. introduce a new flag for ocfs2_inode_lock_full:
OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH; it means just getting back disk inode bh for
us if we've got cluster lock.
3. export a helper: ocfs2_is_locked_by_me() is used to check if we have
got the cluster lock in the upper code path.
The tracking logic should be used by some of the ocfs2 vfs's callbacks,
to solve the recursive locking issue cuased by the fact that vfs
routines can call into each other.
The performance penalty of processing the holder list should only be
seen at a few cases where the tracking logic is used, such as get/set
acl.
You may ask what if the first time we got a PR lock, and the second time
we want a EX lock? fortunately, this case never happens in the real
world, as far as I can see, including permission check,
(get|set)_(acl|attr), and the gfs2 code also do so.
[sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx remove some inlines]
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170117100948.11657-2-zren@xxxxxxxx
Signed-off-by: Eric Ren <zren@xxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Junxiao Bi <junxiao.bi@xxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Joseph Qi <jiangqi903@xxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Mark Fasheh <mfasheh@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Joel Becker <jlbec@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c | 105 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h | 18 +++++++++
fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h | 1
3 files changed, 121 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.c
@@ -531,6 +531,7 @@ void ocfs2_lock_res_init_once(struct ocf
init_waitqueue_head(&res->l_event);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_blocked_list);
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_mask_waiters);
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&res->l_holders);
}
void ocfs2_inode_lock_res_init(struct ocfs2_lock_res *res,
@@ -748,6 +749,50 @@ void ocfs2_lock_res_free(struct ocfs2_lo
res->l_flags = 0UL;
}
+/*
+ * Keep a list of processes who have interest in a lockres.
+ * Note: this is now only uesed for check recursive cluster locking.
+ */
+static inline void ocfs2_add_holder(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
+{
+ INIT_LIST_HEAD(&oh->oh_list);
+ oh->oh_owner_pid = get_pid(task_pid(current));
+
+ spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
+ list_add_tail(&oh->oh_list, &lockres->l_holders);
+ spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
+}
+
+static inline void ocfs2_remove_holder(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
+{
+ spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
+ list_del(&oh->oh_list);
+ spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
+
+ put_pid(oh->oh_owner_pid);
+}
+
+static inline int ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres)
+{
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh;
+ struct pid *pid;
+
+ /* look in the list of holders for one with the current task as owner */
+ spin_lock(&lockres->l_lock);
+ pid = task_pid(current);
+ list_for_each_entry(oh, &lockres->l_holders, oh_list) {
+ if (oh->oh_owner_pid == pid) {
+ spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
+ return 1;
+ }
+ }
+ spin_unlock(&lockres->l_lock);
+
+ return 0;
+}
+
static inline void ocfs2_inc_holders(struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres,
int level)
{
@@ -2343,8 +2388,9 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested(struct
goto getbh;
}
- if (ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
- goto local;
+ if ((arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH) ||
+ ocfs2_mount_local(osb))
+ goto update;
if (!(arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY))
ocfs2_wait_for_recovery(osb);
@@ -2373,7 +2419,7 @@ int ocfs2_inode_lock_full_nested(struct
if (!(arg_flags & OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY))
ocfs2_wait_for_recovery(osb);
-local:
+update:
/*
* We only see this flag if we're being called from
* ocfs2_read_locked_inode(). It means we're locking an inode
@@ -2515,6 +2561,59 @@ void ocfs2_inode_unlock(struct inode *in
ocfs2_cluster_unlock(OCFS2_SB(inode->i_sb), lockres, level);
}
+/*
+ * This _tracker variantes are introduced to deal with the recursive cluster
+ * locking issue. The idea is to keep track of a lock holder on the stack of
+ * the current process. If there's a lock holder on the stack, we know the
+ * task context is already protected by cluster locking. Currently, they're
+ * used in some VFS entry routines.
+ *
+ * return < 0 on error, return == 0 if there's no lock holder on the stack
+ * before this call, return == 1 if this call would be a recursive locking.
+ */
+int ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
+ struct buffer_head **ret_bh,
+ int ex,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh)
+{
+ int status;
+ int arg_flags = 0, has_locked;
+ struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
+
+ lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
+ has_locked = ocfs2_is_locked_by_me(lockres);
+ /* Just get buffer head if the cluster lock has been taken */
+ if (has_locked)
+ arg_flags = OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH;
+
+ if (likely(!has_locked || ret_bh)) {
+ status = ocfs2_inode_lock_full(inode, ret_bh, ex, arg_flags);
+ if (status < 0) {
+ if (status != -ENOENT)
+ mlog_errno(status);
+ return status;
+ }
+ }
+ if (!has_locked)
+ ocfs2_add_holder(lockres, oh);
+
+ return has_locked;
+}
+
+void ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
+ int ex,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh,
+ int had_lock)
+{
+ struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
+
+ lockres = &OCFS2_I(inode)->ip_inode_lockres;
+ if (!had_lock) {
+ ocfs2_remove_holder(lockres, oh);
+ ocfs2_inode_unlock(inode, ex);
+ }
+}
+
int ocfs2_orphan_scan_lock(struct ocfs2_super *osb, u32 *seqno)
{
struct ocfs2_lock_res *lockres;
--- a/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/dlmglue.h
@@ -70,6 +70,11 @@ struct ocfs2_orphan_scan_lvb {
__be32 lvb_os_seqno;
};
+struct ocfs2_lock_holder {
+ struct list_head oh_list;
+ struct pid *oh_owner_pid;
+};
+
/* ocfs2_inode_lock_full() 'arg_flags' flags */
/* don't wait on recovery. */
#define OCFS2_META_LOCK_RECOVERY (0x01)
@@ -77,6 +82,8 @@ struct ocfs2_orphan_scan_lvb {
#define OCFS2_META_LOCK_NOQUEUE (0x02)
/* don't block waiting for the downconvert thread, instead return -EAGAIN */
#define OCFS2_LOCK_NONBLOCK (0x04)
+/* just get back disk inode bh if we've got cluster lock. */
+#define OCFS2_META_LOCK_GETBH (0x08)
/* Locking subclasses of inode cluster lock */
enum {
@@ -170,4 +177,15 @@ void ocfs2_put_dlm_debug(struct ocfs2_dl
/* To set the locking protocol on module initialization */
void ocfs2_set_locking_protocol(void);
+
+/* The _tracker pair is used to avoid cluster recursive locking */
+int ocfs2_inode_lock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
+ struct buffer_head **ret_bh,
+ int ex,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh);
+void ocfs2_inode_unlock_tracker(struct inode *inode,
+ int ex,
+ struct ocfs2_lock_holder *oh,
+ int had_lock);
+
#endif /* DLMGLUE_H */
--- a/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
+++ b/fs/ocfs2/ocfs2.h
@@ -172,6 +172,7 @@ struct ocfs2_lock_res {
struct list_head l_blocked_list;
struct list_head l_mask_waiters;
+ struct list_head l_holders;
unsigned long l_flags;
char l_name[OCFS2_LOCK_ID_MAX_LEN];
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from zren@xxxxxxxx are
queue-4.4/ocfs2-dlmglue-prepare-tracking-logic-to-avoid-recursive-cluster-lock.patch