Re: [PATCH -stable] rcu: Allow for page faults in NMI handlers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 09:25:43AM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 13, 2017 at 11:52:45AM +0200, Greg KH wrote:
> > On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 04:09:28PM -0700, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > > A number of architecture invoke rcu_irq_enter() on exception entry in
> > > order to allow RCU read-side critical sections in the exception handler
> > > when the exception is from an idle or nohz_full CPU.  This works, at
> > > least unless the exception happens in an NMI handler.  In that case,
> > > rcu_nmi_enter() would already have exited the extended quiescent state,
> > > which would mean that rcu_irq_enter() would (incorrectly) cause RCU
> > > to think that it is again in an extended quiescent state.  This will
> > > in turn result in lockdep splats in response to later RCU read-side
> > > critical sections.
> > > 
> > > This commit therefore causes rcu_irq_enter() and rcu_irq_exit() to
> > > take no action if there is an rcu_nmi_enter() in effect, thus avoiding
> > > the unscheduled return to RCU quiescent state.  This in turn should
> > > make the kernel safe for on-demand RCU voyeurism.
> > > 
> > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170922211022.GA18084@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> > > 
> > > Cc: stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx # 4.2.x
> > > Fixes: 0be964be0 ("module: Sanitize RCU usage and locking")
> > > Reported-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> > > Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt (VMware) <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx>
> > 
> > This does not apply to the 4.4-stable tree, was this the correct patch I
> > should be using for that tree?
> 
> Hmmm...  Idiot here backported to v4.4 in Linus's tree, which of
> course might not work...  But it applies to v4.4.92 of -stable:
> 
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux-stable.git
> 
> Am I still applying it in the wrong place?

Ugh, no, you are doing the right thing.  I don't know what failed on my
end, that's what I get for trying to deal with RCU early in the morning
:)

I'll go apply this now, sorry for the noise, and thanks for checking and
the backport.

greg k-h



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]