On Mon, 9 Sep 2013 19:39:04 +0100 Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On Mon, Sep 09, 2013 at 02:01:15PM -0400, Steven Rostedt wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 24, 2013 at 03:02:45PM +0100, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > 3.2.49-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. > > > > > > ------------------ > > > > > > From: Hauke Mehrtens <hauke@xxxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > commit 693026ef2e751fd94d2e6c71028e68343cc875d5 upstream. > > > > > > When b43 gets build into the kernel and it should use bcma we have to > > > ensure that bcma was also build into the kernel and not as a module. > > > In this patch this is also done for SSB, although you can not > > > build b43 without ssb support for now. > > > > > > This fixes a build problem reported by Randy Dunlap in > > > 5187EB95.2060605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > > > > Hauke, > > > > Just an FYI, if you find yourself adding message id's as references in > > git commits, use the following tag: > > > > Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/5187EB95.2060605@xxxxxxxxxxxxx > [...] > > http://mid.gmane.org sucks less (most of the time). Initially, LKML would be archived on kernel.org, but that never happened and doesn't seem it will after the whole security breach incident. But if mid.gname.org is a better link to forward to, then perhaps Konstantin could update it. In any case, as I would think kernel.org will be around as long as Linux is still in use, having the link go to kernel.org, and then kernel.org could point the result to where ever it liked, is still the best option. -- Steve -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html