Re: [PATCH for-next 0/8] IB/hfi1, core, rdmavt: Driver fixes for 10/2/2017

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/5/2017 6:44 AM, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
> On 10/5/2017 3:04 AM, Leon Romanovsky wrote:
>> On Wed, Oct 04, 2017 at 09:22:06PM -0400, Dennis Dalessandro wrote:
>>> Maybe I wasn't too clear, I didn't intend any of those to go for-rc.
>>> So yep
>>> for-next was the right target.

Ok.

>>> I would have liked to get the fixes into -rc but they were just too
>>> complex
>>> for this late in the game is all I meant.

Understood.

>> IMHO, the number of LOCs shouldn't be the gating factor for -rc, but the
>> severity of fixes yes.
> 
> Not the gating factor necessarily, but a factor that has to be be
> weighed against the severity of the bug being fixed. As we get into
> later -rc cycles the bar for risk vs reward gets raised, not that there
> should be a limit of X LOC for -rc whatever it's more of an overall
> assessment of the risk of causing more harm than good.

Exactly.  And given the rc stage we are at now, and the complexity of
the fixes, you made the right call.


-- 
Doug Ledford <dledford@xxxxxxxxxx>
    GPG Key ID: B826A3330E572FDD
    Key fingerprint = AE6B 1BDA 122B 23B4 265B  1274 B826 A333 0E57 2FDD

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]