4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
commit 3664847d95e60a9a943858b7800f8484669740fc upstream.
We have a race condition in below scenario, say have 3 continuous stripes, sh1,
sh2 and sh3, sh1 is the stripe_head of sh2 and sh3:
CPU1 CPU2 CPU3
handle_stripe(sh3)
stripe_add_to_batch_list(sh3)
-> lock(sh2, sh3)
-> lock batch_lock(sh1)
-> add sh3 to batch_list of sh1
-> unlock batch_lock(sh1)
clear_batch_ready(sh1)
-> lock(sh1) and batch_lock(sh1)
-> clear STRIPE_BATCH_READY for all stripes in batch_list
-> unlock(sh1) and batch_lock(sh1)
->clear_batch_ready(sh3)
-->test_and_clear_bit(STRIPE_BATCH_READY, sh3)
--->return 0 as sh->batch == NULL
-> sh3->batch_head = sh1
-> unlock (sh2, sh3)
In CPU1, handle_stripe will continue handle sh3 even it's in batch stripe list
of sh1. By moving sh3->batch_head assignment in to batch_lock, we make it
impossible to clear STRIPE_BATCH_READY before batch_head is set.
Thanks Stephane for helping debug this tricky issue.
Reported-and-tested-by: Stephane Thiell <sthiell@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Shaohua Li <shli@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/md/raid5.c | 10 ++++++++--
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/md/raid5.c
+++ b/drivers/md/raid5.c
@@ -829,6 +829,14 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(str
spin_unlock(&head->batch_head->batch_lock);
goto unlock_out;
}
+ /*
+ * We must assign batch_head of this stripe within the
+ * batch_lock, otherwise clear_batch_ready of batch head
+ * stripe could clear BATCH_READY bit of this stripe and
+ * this stripe->batch_head doesn't get assigned, which
+ * could confuse clear_batch_ready for this stripe
+ */
+ sh->batch_head = head->batch_head;
/*
* at this point, head's BATCH_READY could be cleared, but we
@@ -836,8 +844,6 @@ static void stripe_add_to_batch_list(str
*/
list_add(&sh->batch_list, &head->batch_list);
spin_unlock(&head->batch_head->batch_lock);
-
- sh->batch_head = head->batch_head;
} else {
head->batch_head = head;
sh->batch_head = head->batch_head;