4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
commit 157c460e10cb6eca29ccbd0f023db159d0c55ec7 upstream.
The device_pm_check_callbacks() function doesn't check legacy
->suspend and ->resume callback pointers under the device's
bus type, class and driver, so in some cases it may set the
no_pm_callbacks flag for the device incorrectly and then the
callbacks may be skipped during system suspend/resume, which
shouldn't happen.
Fixes: aa8e54b55947 (PM / sleep: Go direct_complete if driver has no callbacks)
Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/base/power/main.c | 9 ++++++---
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/base/power/main.c
+++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c
@@ -1757,10 +1757,13 @@ void device_pm_check_callbacks(struct de
{
spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
dev->power.no_pm_callbacks =
- (!dev->bus || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->bus->pm)) &&
- (!dev->class || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->class->pm)) &&
+ (!dev->bus || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->bus->pm) &&
+ !dev->bus->suspend && !dev->bus->resume)) &&
+ (!dev->class || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->class->pm) &&
+ !dev->class->suspend && !dev->class->resume)) &&
(!dev->type || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->type->pm)) &&
(!dev->pm_domain || pm_ops_is_empty(&dev->pm_domain->ops)) &&
- (!dev->driver || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->driver->pm));
+ (!dev->driver || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->driver->pm) &&
+ !dev->driver->suspend && !dev->driver->resume));
spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock);
}