4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> commit 157c460e10cb6eca29ccbd0f023db159d0c55ec7 upstream. The device_pm_check_callbacks() function doesn't check legacy ->suspend and ->resume callback pointers under the device's bus type, class and driver, so in some cases it may set the no_pm_callbacks flag for the device incorrectly and then the callbacks may be skipped during system suspend/resume, which shouldn't happen. Fixes: aa8e54b55947 (PM / sleep: Go direct_complete if driver has no callbacks) Signed-off-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@xxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- drivers/base/power/main.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) --- a/drivers/base/power/main.c +++ b/drivers/base/power/main.c @@ -1835,10 +1835,13 @@ void device_pm_check_callbacks(struct de { spin_lock_irq(&dev->power.lock); dev->power.no_pm_callbacks = - (!dev->bus || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->bus->pm)) && - (!dev->class || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->class->pm)) && + (!dev->bus || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->bus->pm) && + !dev->bus->suspend && !dev->bus->resume)) && + (!dev->class || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->class->pm) && + !dev->class->suspend && !dev->class->resume)) && (!dev->type || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->type->pm)) && (!dev->pm_domain || pm_ops_is_empty(&dev->pm_domain->ops)) && - (!dev->driver || pm_ops_is_empty(dev->driver->pm)); + (!dev->driver || (pm_ops_is_empty(dev->driver->pm) && + !dev->driver->suspend && !dev->driver->resume)); spin_unlock_irq(&dev->power.lock); }