> On Sep 12, 2017, at 11:08 AM, Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> Hi,
> we are seeing the following splat with Debian 3.16 stable kernel
>
> BUG: scheduling while atomic: MATLAB/26771/0x00000100
> Modules linked in: veeamsnap(O) hmac cbc cts nfsv4 dns_resolver rpcsec_gss_krb5 nfsd auth_rpcgss oid_registry nfs_acl nfs lockd fscache sunrpc vmw_vso$
> CPU: 0 PID: 26771 Comm: MATLAB Tainted: G O 3.16.0-4-amd64 #1 Debian 3.16.7-ckt20-1+deb8u3
> Hardware name: VMware, Inc. VMware Virtual Platform/440BX Desktop Reference Platform, BIOS 6.00 09/21/2015
> ffff88315c1e4c20 ffffffff8150db3f ffff88193f803dc8 ffffffff8150acdf
> ffffffff815103a2 0000000000012f00 ffff8819423dbfd8 0000000000012f00
> ffff88315c1e4c20 ffff88193f803dc8 ffff88193f803d50 ffff88193f803dc0
> Call Trace:
> <IRQ> [<ffffffff8150db3f>] ? dump_stack+0x41/0x51
> [<ffffffff8150acdf>] ? __schedule_bug+0x48/0x55
> [<ffffffff815103a2>] ? __schedule+0x5d2/0x700
> [<ffffffff8150f9b9>] ? schedule_timeout+0x229/0x2a0
> [<ffffffff8109ba70>] ? select_task_rq_fair+0x390/0x700
> [<ffffffff8109f780>] ? check_preempt_wakeup+0x120/0x1d0
> [<ffffffff81510eb8>] ? wait_for_completion+0xa8/0x120
> [<ffffffff81096de0>] ? wake_up_state+0x10/0x10
> [<ffffffff810c3da0>] ? call_rcu_bh+0x20/0x20
> [<ffffffff810c180b>] ? wait_rcu_gp+0x4b/0x60
> [<ffffffff810c17b0>] ? ftrace_raw_output_rcu_utilization+0x40/0x40
> [<ffffffffa02ca6f5>] ? vmci_event_unsubscribe+0x75/0xb0 [vmw_vmci]
> [<ffffffffa031f5cd>] ? vmci_transport_destruct+0x1d/0xe0 [vmw_vsock_vmci_transport]
> [<ffffffffa03167e3>] ? vsock_sk_destruct+0x13/0x60 [vsock]
> [<ffffffff81409f7a>] ? __sk_free+0x1a/0x130
> [<ffffffffa0320218>] ? vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb+0x1e8/0x2d0 [vmw_vsock_vmci_transport]
> [<ffffffffa02c9cba>] ? vmci_datagram_invoke_guest_handler+0xaa/0xd0 [vmw_vmci]
> [<ffffffffa02cab51>] ? vmci_dispatch_dgs+0xc1/0x200 [vmw_vmci]
> [<ffffffff8106c294>] ? tasklet_action+0xf4/0x100
> [<ffffffff8106c681>] ? __do_softirq+0xf1/0x290
> [<ffffffff8106ca55>] ? irq_exit+0x95/0xa0
> [<ffffffff81516b22>] ? do_IRQ+0x52/0xe0
> [<ffffffff8151496d>] ? common_interrupt+0x6d/0x6d
>
> AFAICS this has been fixed by 4ef7ea9195ea ("VSOCK: sock_put wasn't safe
> to call in interrupt context") but this patch hasn't been backported to
> stable trees. It applies cleanly on top of 3.16 stable tree but I am not
> familiar with the code to send the backport to the stable maintainer
> directly.
>
> Could you double check that the patch below (just a blind cherry-pick)
> is correct and it doesn't need additional patches on top?
Hi,
The patch below has been used to fix the above issue by other distros - among them Redhat for the 3.10 kernel, so it should work for 3.16 as well. In addition to the patch above, there are two other patches that need to be applied on top for the fix to be correct:
8566b86ab9f0f45bc6f7dd422b21de9d0cf5415a "VSOCK: Fix lockdep issue."
and
8ab18d71de8b07d2c4d6f984b718418c09ea45c5 "VSOCK: Detach QP check should filter out non matching QPs."
Thanks,
Jorgen
>
> Ben could you take this to your stable 3.16 branch if the patch is correct?
>
> I am CCing Sasha for 4.1 stable tree as well. I haven't checked whether
> pre 3.16 kernels are affected as well.
> ---
> commit fac774c40b5c512113b6373cad498f35bee7a409
> Author: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Date: Wed Oct 21 04:53:56 2015 -0700
>
> VSOCK: sock_put wasn't safe to call in interrupt context
>
> commit 4ef7ea9195ea73262cd9730fb54e1eb726da157b upstream.
>
> In the vsock vmci_transport driver, sock_put wasn't safe to call
> in interrupt context, since that may call the vsock destructor
> which in turn calls several functions that should only be called
> from process context. This change defers the callling of these
> functions to a worker thread. All these functions were
> deallocation of resources related to the transport itself.
>
> Furthermore, an unused callback was removed to simplify the
> cleanup.
>
> Multiple customers have been hitting this issue when using
> VMware tools on vSphere 2015.
>
> Also added a version to the vmci transport module (starting from
> 1.0.2.0-k since up until now it appears that this module was
> sharing version with vsock that is currently at 1.0.1.0-k).
>
> Reviewed-by: Aditya Asarwade <asarwade@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Reviewed-by: Thomas Hellstrom <thellstrom@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@xxxxxxxxxx>
> Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
>
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> index 9bb63ffec4f2..aed136d27b01 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.c
> @@ -40,13 +40,11 @@
>
> static int vmci_transport_recv_dgram_cb(void *data, struct vmci_datagram *dg);
> static int vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb(void *data, struct vmci_datagram *dg);
> -static void vmci_transport_peer_attach_cb(u32 sub_id,
> - const struct vmci_event_data *ed,
> - void *client_data);
> static void vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb(u32 sub_id,
> const struct vmci_event_data *ed,
> void *client_data);
> static void vmci_transport_recv_pkt_work(struct work_struct *work);
> +static void vmci_transport_cleanup(struct work_struct *work);
> static int vmci_transport_recv_listen(struct sock *sk,
> struct vmci_transport_packet *pkt);
> static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_server(
> @@ -75,6 +73,10 @@ struct vmci_transport_recv_pkt_info {
> struct vmci_transport_packet pkt;
> };
>
> +static LIST_HEAD(vmci_transport_cleanup_list);
> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(vmci_transport_cleanup_lock);
> +static DECLARE_WORK(vmci_transport_cleanup_work, vmci_transport_cleanup);
> +
> static struct vmci_handle vmci_transport_stream_handle = { VMCI_INVALID_ID,
> VMCI_INVALID_ID };
> static u32 vmci_transport_qp_resumed_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> @@ -791,44 +793,6 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_stream_cb(void *data, struct vmci_datagram *dg)
> return err;
> }
>
> -static void vmci_transport_peer_attach_cb(u32 sub_id,
> - const struct vmci_event_data *e_data,
> - void *client_data)
> -{
> - struct sock *sk = client_data;
> - const struct vmci_event_payload_qp *e_payload;
> - struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> -
> - e_payload = vmci_event_data_const_payload(e_data);
> -
> - vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> -
> - /* We don't ask for delayed CBs when we subscribe to this event (we
> - * pass 0 as flags to vmci_event_subscribe()). VMCI makes no
> - * guarantees in that case about what context we might be running in,
> - * so it could be BH or process, blockable or non-blockable. So we
> - * need to account for all possible contexts here.
> - */
> - local_bh_disable();
> - bh_lock_sock(sk);
> -
> - /* XXX This is lame, we should provide a way to lookup sockets by
> - * qp_handle.
> - */
> - if (vmci_handle_is_equal(vmci_trans(vsk)->qp_handle,
> - e_payload->handle)) {
> - /* XXX This doesn't do anything, but in the future we may want
> - * to set a flag here to verify the attach really did occur and
> - * we weren't just sent a datagram claiming it was.
> - */
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> -out:
> - bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> - local_bh_enable();
> -}
> -
> static void vmci_transport_handle_detach(struct sock *sk)
> {
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> @@ -871,28 +835,38 @@ static void vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb(u32 sub_id,
> const struct vmci_event_data *e_data,
> void *client_data)
> {
> - struct sock *sk = client_data;
> + struct vmci_transport *trans = client_data;
> const struct vmci_event_payload_qp *e_payload;
> - struct vsock_sock *vsk;
>
> e_payload = vmci_event_data_const_payload(e_data);
> - vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> - if (vmci_handle_is_invalid(e_payload->handle))
> - return;
> -
> - /* Same rules for locking as for peer_attach_cb(). */
> - local_bh_disable();
> - bh_lock_sock(sk);
>
> /* XXX This is lame, we should provide a way to lookup sockets by
> * qp_handle.
> */
> - if (vmci_handle_is_equal(vmci_trans(vsk)->qp_handle,
> - e_payload->handle))
> - vmci_transport_handle_detach(sk);
> + if (vmci_handle_is_invalid(e_payload->handle) ||
> + vmci_handle_is_equal(trans->qp_handle, e_payload->handle))
> + return;
>
> - bh_unlock_sock(sk);
> - local_bh_enable();
> + /* We don't ask for delayed CBs when we subscribe to this event (we
> + * pass 0 as flags to vmci_event_subscribe()). VMCI makes no
> + * guarantees in that case about what context we might be running in,
> + * so it could be BH or process, blockable or non-blockable. So we
> + * need to account for all possible contexts here.
> + */
> + spin_lock_bh(&trans->lock);
> + if (!trans->sk)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* Apart from here, trans->lock is only grabbed as part of sk destruct,
> + * where trans->sk isn't locked.
> + */
> + bh_lock_sock(trans->sk);
> +
> + vmci_transport_handle_detach(trans->sk);
> +
> + bh_unlock_sock(trans->sk);
> + out:
> + spin_unlock_bh(&trans->lock);
> }
>
> static void vmci_transport_qp_resumed_cb(u32 sub_id,
> @@ -1181,7 +1155,7 @@ vmci_transport_recv_connecting_server(struct sock *listener,
> */
> err = vmci_event_subscribe(VMCI_EVENT_QP_PEER_DETACH,
> vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb,
> - pending, &detach_sub_id);
> + vmci_trans(vpending), &detach_sub_id);
> if (err < VMCI_SUCCESS) {
> vmci_transport_send_reset(pending, pkt);
> err = vmci_transport_error_to_vsock_error(err);
> @@ -1321,7 +1295,6 @@ vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client(struct sock *sk,
> || vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair
> || vmci_trans(vsk)->produce_size != 0
> || vmci_trans(vsk)->consume_size != 0
> - || vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID
> || vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID) {
> skerr = EPROTO;
> err = -EINVAL;
> @@ -1389,7 +1362,6 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client_negotiate(
> struct vsock_sock *vsk;
> struct vmci_handle handle;
> struct vmci_qp *qpair;
> - u32 attach_sub_id;
> u32 detach_sub_id;
> bool is_local;
> u32 flags;
> @@ -1399,7 +1371,6 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client_negotiate(
>
> vsk = vsock_sk(sk);
> handle = VMCI_INVALID_HANDLE;
> - attach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> detach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
>
> /* If we have gotten here then we should be past the point where old
> @@ -1444,23 +1415,15 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client_negotiate(
> goto destroy;
> }
>
> - /* Subscribe to attach and detach events first.
> + /* Subscribe to detach events first.
> *
> * XXX We attach once for each queue pair created for now so it is easy
> * to find the socket (it's provided), but later we should only
> * subscribe once and add a way to lookup sockets by queue pair handle.
> */
> - err = vmci_event_subscribe(VMCI_EVENT_QP_PEER_ATTACH,
> - vmci_transport_peer_attach_cb,
> - sk, &attach_sub_id);
> - if (err < VMCI_SUCCESS) {
> - err = vmci_transport_error_to_vsock_error(err);
> - goto destroy;
> - }
> -
> err = vmci_event_subscribe(VMCI_EVENT_QP_PEER_DETACH,
> vmci_transport_peer_detach_cb,
> - sk, &detach_sub_id);
> + vmci_trans(vsk), &detach_sub_id);
> if (err < VMCI_SUCCESS) {
> err = vmci_transport_error_to_vsock_error(err);
> goto destroy;
> @@ -1496,7 +1459,6 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client_negotiate(
> vmci_trans(vsk)->produce_size = vmci_trans(vsk)->consume_size =
> pkt->u.size;
>
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id = attach_sub_id;
> vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id = detach_sub_id;
>
> vmci_trans(vsk)->notify_ops->process_negotiate(sk);
> @@ -1504,9 +1466,6 @@ static int vmci_transport_recv_connecting_client_negotiate(
> return 0;
>
> destroy:
> - if (attach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID)
> - vmci_event_unsubscribe(attach_sub_id);
> -
> if (detach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID)
> vmci_event_unsubscribe(detach_sub_id);
>
> @@ -1607,9 +1566,11 @@ static int vmci_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> vmci_trans(vsk)->qp_handle = VMCI_INVALID_HANDLE;
> vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair = NULL;
> vmci_trans(vsk)->produce_size = vmci_trans(vsk)->consume_size = 0;
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id = vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id =
> - VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> + vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> vmci_trans(vsk)->notify_ops = NULL;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&vmci_trans(vsk)->elem);
> + vmci_trans(vsk)->sk = &vsk->sk;
> + vmci_trans(vsk)->lock = __SPIN_LOCK_UNLOCKED(vmci_trans(vsk)->lock);
> if (psk) {
> vmci_trans(vsk)->queue_pair_size =
> vmci_trans(psk)->queue_pair_size;
> @@ -1629,29 +1590,57 @@ static int vmci_transport_socket_init(struct vsock_sock *vsk,
> return 0;
> }
>
> -static void vmci_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> +static void vmci_transport_free_resources(struct list_head *transport_list)
> {
> - if (vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID) {
> - vmci_event_unsubscribe(vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id);
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->attach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> - }
> + while (!list_empty(transport_list)) {
> + struct vmci_transport *transport =
> + list_first_entry(transport_list, struct vmci_transport,
> + elem);
> + list_del(&transport->elem);
>
> - if (vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID) {
> - vmci_event_unsubscribe(vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id);
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->detach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> - }
> + if (transport->detach_sub_id != VMCI_INVALID_ID) {
> + vmci_event_unsubscribe(transport->detach_sub_id);
> + transport->detach_sub_id = VMCI_INVALID_ID;
> + }
>
> - if (!vmci_handle_is_invalid(vmci_trans(vsk)->qp_handle)) {
> - vmci_qpair_detach(&vmci_trans(vsk)->qpair);
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->qp_handle = VMCI_INVALID_HANDLE;
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->produce_size = 0;
> - vmci_trans(vsk)->consume_size = 0;
> + if (!vmci_handle_is_invalid(transport->qp_handle)) {
> + vmci_qpair_detach(&transport->qpair);
> + transport->qp_handle = VMCI_INVALID_HANDLE;
> + transport->produce_size = 0;
> + transport->consume_size = 0;
> + }
> +
> + kfree(transport);
> }
> +}
> +
> +static void vmci_transport_cleanup(struct work_struct *work)
> +{
> + LIST_HEAD(pending);
> +
> + spin_lock_bh(&vmci_transport_cleanup_lock);
> + list_replace_init(&vmci_transport_cleanup_list, &pending);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vmci_transport_cleanup_lock);
> + vmci_transport_free_resources(&pending);
> +}
> +
> +static void vmci_transport_destruct(struct vsock_sock *vsk)
> +{
> + /* Ensure that the detach callback doesn't use the sk/vsk
> + * we are about to destruct.
> + */
> + spin_lock_bh(&vmci_trans(vsk)->lock);
> + vmci_trans(vsk)->sk = NULL;
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vmci_trans(vsk)->lock);
>
> if (vmci_trans(vsk)->notify_ops)
> vmci_trans(vsk)->notify_ops->socket_destruct(vsk);
>
> - kfree(vsk->trans);
> + spin_lock_bh(&vmci_transport_cleanup_lock);
> + list_add(&vmci_trans(vsk)->elem, &vmci_transport_cleanup_list);
> + spin_unlock_bh(&vmci_transport_cleanup_lock);
> + schedule_work(&vmci_transport_cleanup_work);
> +
> vsk->trans = NULL;
> }
>
> @@ -2148,6 +2137,9 @@ module_init(vmci_transport_init);
>
> static void __exit vmci_transport_exit(void)
> {
> + cancel_work_sync(&vmci_transport_cleanup_work);
> + vmci_transport_free_resources(&vmci_transport_cleanup_list);
> +
> if (!vmci_handle_is_invalid(vmci_transport_stream_handle)) {
> if (vmci_datagram_destroy_handle(
> vmci_transport_stream_handle) != VMCI_SUCCESS)
> @@ -2166,6 +2158,7 @@ module_exit(vmci_transport_exit);
>
> MODULE_AUTHOR("VMware, Inc.");
> MODULE_DESCRIPTION("VMCI transport for Virtual Sockets");
> +MODULE_VERSION("1.0.2.0-k");
> MODULE_LICENSE("GPL v2");
> MODULE_ALIAS("vmware_vsock");
> MODULE_ALIAS_NETPROTO(PF_VSOCK);
> diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
> index ce6c9623d5f0..2ad46f39649f 100644
> --- a/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
> +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/vmci_transport.h
> @@ -119,10 +119,12 @@ struct vmci_transport {
> u64 queue_pair_size;
> u64 queue_pair_min_size;
> u64 queue_pair_max_size;
> - u32 attach_sub_id;
> u32 detach_sub_id;
> union vmci_transport_notify notify;
> struct vmci_transport_notify_ops *notify_ops;
> + struct list_head elem;
> + struct sock *sk;
> + spinlock_t lock; /* protects sk. */
> };
>
> int vmci_transport_register(void);
> --
> Michal Hocko
> SUSE Labs