4.13-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 3bff08dffe3115a25ce04b95ea75f6d868572c60 upstream.
Commit a894cf6c5a82 ("mtd: nand: mxc: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops")
introduced a bug in the OOB layout description. Even if the driver claims
that 3 ECC bytes are reserved to protect 512 bytes of data, it's actually
5 ECC bytes to protect 512+6 bytes of data (some OOB bytes are also
protected using extra ECC bytes).
Fix the mxc_v1_ooblayout_{free,ecc}() functions to reflect this behavior.
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Fixes: a894cf6c5a82 ("mtd: nand: mxc: switch to mtd_ooblayout_ops")
Signed-off-by: Boris Brezillon <boris.brezillon@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c | 7 ++++---
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
--- a/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
+++ b/drivers/mtd/nand/mxc_nand.c
@@ -876,6 +876,8 @@ static void mxc_do_addr_cycle(struct mtd
}
}
+#define MXC_V1_ECCBYTES 5
+
static int mxc_v1_ooblayout_ecc(struct mtd_info *mtd, int section,
struct mtd_oob_region *oobregion)
{
@@ -885,7 +887,7 @@ static int mxc_v1_ooblayout_ecc(struct m
return -ERANGE;
oobregion->offset = (section * 16) + 6;
- oobregion->length = nand_chip->ecc.bytes;
+ oobregion->length = MXC_V1_ECCBYTES;
return 0;
}
@@ -907,8 +909,7 @@ static int mxc_v1_ooblayout_free(struct
oobregion->length = 4;
}
} else {
- oobregion->offset = ((section - 1) * 16) +
- nand_chip->ecc.bytes + 6;
+ oobregion->offset = ((section - 1) * 16) + MXC_V1_ECCBYTES + 6;
if (section < nand_chip->ecc.steps)
oobregion->length = (section * 16) + 6 -
oobregion->offset;