RE: [PATCH] iommu/amd: flush IOTLB for specific domains only (v3)

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Daniel,

>-----Original Message-----
>From: Daniel Drake [mailto:drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx]
>Sent: Tuesday, September 12, 2017 12:20 PM
>To: Nath, Arindam <Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx>
>Cc: Joerg Roedel <joro@xxxxxxxxxx>; Lendacky, Thomas
><Thomas.Lendacky@xxxxxxx>; iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd-
>gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; Deucher, Alexander
><Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Bridgman, John
><John.Bridgman@xxxxxxx>; Suthikulpanit, Suravee
><Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Craig Stein
><stein12c@xxxxxxxxx>; michel@xxxxxxxxxxx; Kuehling, Felix
><Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: flush IOTLB for specific domains only (v3)
>
>Hi,
>
>On Tue, May 30, 2017 at 3:38 PM, Nath, Arindam <Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx>
>wrote:
>>>-----Original Message-----
>>>From: Joerg Roedel [mailto:joro@xxxxxxxxxx]
>>>Sent: Monday, May 29, 2017 8:09 PM
>>>To: Nath, Arindam <Arindam.Nath@xxxxxxx>; Lendacky, Thomas
>>><Thomas.Lendacky@xxxxxxx>
>>>Cc: iommu@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx; amd-gfx@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx;
>>>Deucher, Alexander <Alexander.Deucher@xxxxxxx>; Bridgman, John
>>><John.Bridgman@xxxxxxx>; drake@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Suthikulpanit,
>Suravee
>>><Suravee.Suthikulpanit@xxxxxxx>; linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx; Craig Stein
>>><stein12c@xxxxxxxxx>; michel@xxxxxxxxxxx; Kuehling, Felix
>>><Felix.Kuehling@xxxxxxx>; stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>>Subject: Re: [PATCH] iommu/amd: flush IOTLB for specific domains only
>(v3)
>>>
>>>Hi Arindam,
>>>
>>>I met Tom Lendacky last week in Nuremberg last week and he told me he is
>>>working on the same area of the code that this patch is for. His reason
>>>for touching this code was to solve some locking problems. Maybe you two
>>>can work together on a joint approach to improve this?
>>
>> Sure Joerg, I will work with Tom.
>
>What was the end result here? I see that the code has been reworked in
>4.13 so your original patch no longer applies. Is the reworked version
>also expected to solve the original issue?

Yes, if the reworked patch resolves the issue, my patch won't be required anymore.

Thanks,
Arindam

>
>Thanks
>Daniel




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]