On 2017/9/6 11:10, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> On 09/06, Chao Yu wrote:
>> On 2017/9/6 5:06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
>>> This patch fixes bavail and bfree finally.
>>>
>>> long f_bfree; /* free blocks in fs */
>>> long f_bavail; /* free blocks avail to non-superuser */
>>>
>>> So, bfree represents all the reserved blocks, while bavail does the space only
>>> visible to normal user.
>>>
>>> Fix: 3e6d0b4d9c1c ("f2fs: fix incorrect f_bfree calculation in ->statfs")
>>> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.8+
>>> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>> ---
>>> fs/f2fs/super.c | 4 ++--
>>> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>>>
>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/super.c b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> index 7e29db227910..17cca4cb93af 100644
>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/super.c
>>> @@ -955,8 +955,8 @@ static int f2fs_statfs(struct dentry *dentry, struct kstatfs *buf)
>>> buf->f_bsize = sbi->blocksize;
>>>
>>> buf->f_blocks = total_count - start_count;
>>> - buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) + ovp_count;
>>> - buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) -
>>> + buf->f_bfree = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi);
>>> + buf->f_bavail = user_block_count - valid_user_blocks(sbi) - ovp_count -
>>
>> set_cp(user_block_count, ((get_cp(free_segment_count) + 6 -
>> get_cp(overprov_segment_count)) * c.blks_per_seg));
>>
>> As we calculated in mkfs, we have removed ovp_count in user_block_count, so
>> shouldn't we add ovp_count for f_bfree here?
>
> Hehe, I already dropped this. :P
Alright. :)
> It seems like something wrong with df in android.
Maybe its version is too old?
Thanks,
>
>>
>> Thanks,
>>
>>> sbi->reserved_blocks;
>>>
>>> avail_node_count = sbi->total_node_count - F2FS_RESERVED_NODE_NUM;
>>>
>
> .
>