4.12-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 88a5c690b66110ad255380d8f629c629cf6ca559 ]
James reported that on MIPS32 bpf_trace_printk() is currently
broken while MIPS64 works fine:
bpf_trace_printk() uses conditional operators to attempt to
pass different types to __trace_printk() depending on the
format operators. This doesn't work as intended on 32-bit
architectures where u32 and long are passed differently to
u64, since the result of C conditional operators follows the
"usual arithmetic conversions" rules, such that the values
passed to __trace_printk() will always be u64 [causing issues
later in the va_list handling for vscnprintf()].
For example the samples/bpf/tracex5 test printed lines like
below on MIPS32, where the fd and buf have come from the u64
fd argument, and the size from the buf argument:
[...] 1180.941542: 0x00000001: write(fd=1, buf= (null), size=6258688)
Instead of this:
[...] 1625.616026: 0x00000001: write(fd=1, buf=009e4000, size=512)
One way to get it working is to expand various combinations
of argument types into 8 different combinations for 32 bit
and 64 bit kernels. Fix tested by James on MIPS32 and MIPS64
as well that it resolves the issue.
Fixes: 9c959c863f82 ("tracing: Allow BPF programs to call bpf_trace_printk()")
Reported-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: James Hogan <james.hogan@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c | 34 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----
1 file changed, 30 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
--- a/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
+++ b/kernel/trace/bpf_trace.c
@@ -203,10 +203,36 @@ BPF_CALL_5(bpf_trace_printk, char *, fmt
fmt_cnt++;
}
- return __trace_printk(1/* fake ip will not be printed */, fmt,
- mod[0] == 2 ? arg1 : mod[0] == 1 ? (long) arg1 : (u32) arg1,
- mod[1] == 2 ? arg2 : mod[1] == 1 ? (long) arg2 : (u32) arg2,
- mod[2] == 2 ? arg3 : mod[2] == 1 ? (long) arg3 : (u32) arg3);
+/* Horrid workaround for getting va_list handling working with different
+ * argument type combinations generically for 32 and 64 bit archs.
+ */
+#define __BPF_TP_EMIT() __BPF_ARG3_TP()
+#define __BPF_TP(...) \
+ __trace_printk(1 /* Fake ip will not be printed. */, \
+ fmt, ##__VA_ARGS__)
+
+#define __BPF_ARG1_TP(...) \
+ ((mod[0] == 2 || (mod[0] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \
+ ? __BPF_TP(arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : ((mod[0] == 1 || (mod[0] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \
+ ? __BPF_TP((long)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : __BPF_TP((u32)arg1, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
+
+#define __BPF_ARG2_TP(...) \
+ ((mod[1] == 2 || (mod[1] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \
+ ? __BPF_ARG1_TP(arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : ((mod[1] == 1 || (mod[1] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \
+ ? __BPF_ARG1_TP((long)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : __BPF_ARG1_TP((u32)arg2, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
+
+#define __BPF_ARG3_TP(...) \
+ ((mod[2] == 2 || (mod[2] == 1 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 64)) \
+ ? __BPF_ARG2_TP(arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : ((mod[2] == 1 || (mod[2] == 0 && __BITS_PER_LONG == 32)) \
+ ? __BPF_ARG2_TP((long)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__) \
+ : __BPF_ARG2_TP((u32)arg3, ##__VA_ARGS__)))
+
+ return __BPF_TP_EMIT();
}
static const struct bpf_func_proto bpf_trace_printk_proto = {