The patch titled
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM
has been added to the -mm tree. Its filename is
mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch
This patch should soon appear at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmots/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch
and later at
http://ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/broken-out/mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch
Before you just go and hit "reply", please:
a) Consider who else should be cc'ed
b) Prefer to cc a suitable mailing list as well
c) Ideally: find the original patch on the mailing list and do a
reply-to-all to that, adding suitable additional cc's
*** Remember to use Documentation/SubmitChecklist when testing your code ***
The -mm tree is included into linux-next and is updated
there every 3-4 working days
------------------------------------------------------
From: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: mm/vmalloc.c: don't unconditonally use __GFP_HIGHMEM
19809c2da28a ("mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly") added use of
__GFP_HIGHMEM for allocations. vmalloc_32 may use GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32 which
does not play nice with __GFP_HIGHMEM and will trigger a BUG in gfp_zone.
Only add __GFP_HIGHMEM if we aren't using GFP_DMA/GFP_DMA32.
Bugzilla: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1482249
Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20170816220705.31374-1-labbott@xxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 19809c2da28a ("mm, vmalloc: use __GFP_HIGHMEM implicitly")
Signed-off-by: Laura Abbott <labbott@xxxxxxxxxx>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxx>
Cc: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@xxxxxxx>
Cc: "Kirill A. Shutemov" <kirill.shutemov@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
mm/vmalloc.c | 13 ++++++++-----
1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff -puN mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem mm/vmalloc.c
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c~mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem
+++ a/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -1671,7 +1671,10 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
struct page **pages;
unsigned int nr_pages, array_size, i;
const gfp_t nested_gfp = (gfp_mask & GFP_RECLAIM_MASK) | __GFP_ZERO;
- const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_HIGHMEM | __GFP_NOWARN;
+ const gfp_t alloc_mask = gfp_mask | __GFP_NOWARN;
+ const gfp_t highmem_mask = (gfp_mask & (GFP_DMA | GFP_DMA32)) ?
+ 0 :
+ __GFP_HIGHMEM;
nr_pages = get_vm_area_size(area) >> PAGE_SHIFT;
array_size = (nr_pages * sizeof(struct page *));
@@ -1679,7 +1682,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
area->nr_pages = nr_pages;
/* Please note that the recursion is strictly bounded. */
if (array_size > PAGE_SIZE) {
- pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp|__GFP_HIGHMEM,
+ pages = __vmalloc_node(array_size, 1, nested_gfp|highmem_mask,
PAGE_KERNEL, node, area->caller);
} else {
pages = kmalloc_node(array_size, nested_gfp, node);
@@ -1700,9 +1703,9 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
}
if (node == NUMA_NO_NODE)
- page = alloc_page(alloc_mask);
+ page = alloc_page(alloc_mask|highmem_mask);
else
- page = alloc_pages_node(node, alloc_mask, 0);
+ page = alloc_pages_node(node, alloc_mask|highmem_mask, 0);
if (unlikely(!page)) {
/* Successfully allocated i pages, free them in __vunmap() */
@@ -1710,7 +1713,7 @@ static void *__vmalloc_area_node(struct
goto fail;
}
area->pages[i] = page;
- if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask))
+ if (gfpflags_allow_blocking(gfp_mask|highmem_mask))
cond_resched();
}
_
Patches currently in -mm which might be from labbott@xxxxxxxxxx are
mm-vmalloc-dont-unconditonally-use-__gfp_highmem.patch