This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled
tcp_bbr: init pacing rate on first RTT sample
to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary
The filename of the patch is:
tcp_bbr-init-pacing-rate-on-first-rtt-sample.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.
If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.
>From foo@baz Tue Aug 8 16:27:53 PDT 2017
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:25 -0400
Subject: tcp_bbr: init pacing rate on first RTT sample
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 32984565574da7ed3afa10647bb4020d7a9e6c93 ]
Fixes the following behavior: for connections that had no RTT sample
at the time of initializing congestion control, BBR was initializing
the pacing rate to a high nominal rate (based an a guess of RTT=1ms,
in case this is LAN traffic). Then BBR never adjusted the pacing rate
downward upon obtaining an actual RTT sample, if the connection never
filled the pipe (e.g. all sends were small app-limited writes()).
This fix adjusts the pacing rate upon obtaining the first RTT sample.
Fixes: 0f8782ea1497 ("tcp_bbr: add BBR congestion control")
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c | 10 +++++++++-
1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -83,7 +83,8 @@ struct bbr {
cwnd_gain:10, /* current gain for setting cwnd */
full_bw_cnt:3, /* number of rounds without large bw gains */
cycle_idx:3, /* current index in pacing_gain cycle array */
- unused_b:6;
+ has_seen_rtt:1, /* have we seen an RTT sample yet? */
+ unused_b:5;
u32 prior_cwnd; /* prior cwnd upon entering loss recovery */
u32 full_bw; /* recent bw, to estimate if pipe is full */
};
@@ -196,11 +197,13 @@ static u32 bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate(struct
static void bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt(struct sock *sk)
{
struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+ struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk);
u64 bw;
u32 rtt_us;
if (tp->srtt_us) { /* any RTT sample yet? */
rtt_us = max(tp->srtt_us >> 3, 1U);
+ bbr->has_seen_rtt = 1;
} else { /* no RTT sample yet */
rtt_us = USEC_PER_MSEC; /* use nominal default RTT */
}
@@ -218,8 +221,12 @@ static void bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rt
*/
static void bbr_set_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk, u32 bw, int gain)
{
+ struct tcp_sock *tp = tcp_sk(sk);
+ struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk);
u32 rate = bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate(sk, bw, gain);
+ if (unlikely(!bbr->has_seen_rtt && tp->srtt_us))
+ bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt(sk);
if (bbr_full_bw_reached(sk) || rate > sk->sk_pacing_rate)
sk->sk_pacing_rate = rate;
}
@@ -808,6 +815,7 @@ static void bbr_init(struct sock *sk)
minmax_reset(&bbr->bw, bbr->rtt_cnt, 0); /* init max bw to 0 */
+ bbr->has_seen_rtt = 0;
bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt(sk);
bbr->restore_cwnd = 0;
Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx are
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-remove-sk_pacing_rate-0-transient-during-init.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate-helper.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt-helper.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-init-pacing-rate-on-first-rtt-sample.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-cut-pacing-rate-only-if-filled-pipe.patch