Patch "tcp_bbr: cut pacing rate only if filled pipe" has been added to the 4.9-stable tree

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



This is a note to let you know that I've just added the patch titled

    tcp_bbr: cut pacing rate only if filled pipe

to the 4.9-stable tree which can be found at:
    http://www.kernel.org/git/?p=linux/kernel/git/stable/stable-queue.git;a=summary

The filename of the patch is:
     tcp_bbr-cut-pacing-rate-only-if-filled-pipe.patch
and it can be found in the queue-4.9 subdirectory.

If you, or anyone else, feels it should not be added to the stable tree,
please let <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> know about it.


>From foo@baz Tue Aug  8 16:27:53 PDT 2017
From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 14 Jul 2017 17:49:21 -0400
Subject: tcp_bbr: cut pacing rate only if filled pipe

From: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>


[ Upstream commit 4aea287e90dd61a48268ff2994b56f9799441b62 ]

In bbr_set_pacing_rate(), which decides whether to cut the pacing
rate, there was some code that considered exiting STARTUP to be
equivalent to the notion of filling the pipe (i.e.,
bbr_full_bw_reached()). Specifically, as the code was structured,
exiting STARTUP and going into PROBE_RTT could cause us to cut the
pacing rate down to something silly and low, based on whatever
bandwidth samples we've had so far, when it's possible that all of
them have been small app-limited bandwidth samples that are not
representative of the bandwidth available in the path. (The code was
correct at the time it was written, but the state machine changed
without this spot being adjusted correspondingly.)

Fixes: 0f8782ea1497 ("tcp_bbr: add BBR congestion control")
Signed-off-by: Neal Cardwell <ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Yuchung Cheng <ycheng@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Soheil Hassas Yeganeh <soheil@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
 net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c |    3 +--
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
+++ b/net/ipv4/tcp_bbr.c
@@ -191,12 +191,11 @@ static u64 bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(struct
  */
 static void bbr_set_pacing_rate(struct sock *sk, u32 bw, int gain)
 {
-	struct bbr *bbr = inet_csk_ca(sk);
 	u64 rate = bw;
 
 	rate = bbr_rate_bytes_per_sec(sk, rate, gain);
 	rate = min_t(u64, rate, sk->sk_max_pacing_rate);
-	if (bbr->mode != BBR_STARTUP || rate > sk->sk_pacing_rate)
+	if (bbr_full_bw_reached(sk) || rate > sk->sk_pacing_rate)
 		sk->sk_pacing_rate = rate;
 }
 


Patches currently in stable-queue which might be from ncardwell@xxxxxxxxxx are

queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-remove-sk_pacing_rate-0-transient-during-init.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_bw_to_pacing_rate-helper.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-introduce-bbr_init_pacing_rate_from_rtt-helper.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-init-pacing-rate-on-first-rtt-sample.patch
queue-4.9/tcp_bbr-cut-pacing-rate-only-if-filled-pipe.patch



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]