Re: [PATCH] kbuild: linker script do not match C names unless LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION is configured

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Hi Nicholas,

2017-08-08 12:19 GMT+09:00 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>:
> On Tue, 8 Aug 2017 10:53:56 +0900
> Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nicholas,
>>
>> 2017-07-26 21:46 GMT+09:00 Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>:
>> > The .data and .bss sections were modified in the generic linker script to
>> > pull in sections named .data.<C identifier>, which are generated by gcc with
>> > -ffunction-sections and -fdata-sections options.
>> >
>> > The problem with this pattern is it can also match section names that Linux
>> > defines explicitly, e.g., .data.unlikely. This can cause Linux sections to
>> > get moved into the wrong place.
>> >
>> > The way to avoid this is to use ".." separators for explicit section names
>> > (the dot character is valid in a section name but not a C identifier).
>> > However currently there are sections which don't follow this rule, so for
>> > now just disable the wild card by default.
>> >
>> > Example: http://marc.info/?l=linux-arm-kernel&m=150106824024221&w=2
>> >
>> > Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.9
>> > Fixes: b67067f1176df ("kbuild: allow archs to select link dead code/data elimination")
>> > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@xxxxxxxxx>
>> > ---
>> >  include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h | 38 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++------------
>> >  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> > index da0be9a8d1de..9623d78f8494 100644
>> > --- a/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> > +++ b/include/asm-generic/vmlinux.lds.h
>> > @@ -60,6 +60,22 @@
>> >  #define ALIGN_FUNCTION()  . = ALIGN(8)
>> >
>> >  /*
>> > + * LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION option enables -fdata-sections, which
>> > + * generates .data.identifier sections, which need to be pulled in with
>> > + * .data. We don't want to pull in .data..other sections, which Linux
>> > + * has defined. Same for text and bss.
>> > + */
>> > +#ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
>> > +#define TEXT_MAIN .text .text.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
>> > +#define DATA_MAIN .data .data.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
>> > +#define BSS_MAIN .bss .bss.[0-9a-zA-Z_]*
>> > +#else
>> > +#define TEXT_MAIN .text
>> > +#define DATA_MAIN .data
>> > +#define BSS_MAIN .bss
>> > +#endif
>>
>>
>> From the git-log, I think you are planning to rename
>>   .data.unlikely   ->   .data..unlikey
>> then the problem will be fixed.
>>
>> ("git grep data.unlikely" gave me only 7 instances.)
>>
>>
>> Why is this patch necessary?
>>
>>
>> You are trying to migrate some architectures to DCDE,
>> so this #ifdef does not solve the problem, I think.
>
> Well basically I want to preserve previous behaviour and avoid
> regressions as far as possible. Patches to rename existing
> sections I think would not be so suitable for @stable. And
> there could be other things we've missed.
>
> Yes I would like to ensure all our sections use .. separators
> which (hopefully). Until then I think this is a minimal fix.
>


After you rename the sections, will you revert this patch?

I think the #ifdef CONFIG_LD_DEAD_CODE_DATA_ELIMINATION
should not be permanent.



-- 
Best Regards
Masahiro Yamada



[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]