3.18-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
commit 4c86d77743a54fb2d8a4d18a037a074c892bb3be upstream.
On IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses sk_family is AF_INET6,
but the flow informations are created based on AF_INET.
So the routing set up 'struct flowi4' but we try to
access 'struct flowi6' what leads to an out of bounds
access. Fix this by using the family we get with the
dst_entry, like we do it for the standard policy lookup.
Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Tested-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Steffen Klassert <steffen.klassert@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c | 9 ++++-----
1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
--- a/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
+++ b/net/xfrm/xfrm_policy.c
@@ -1211,15 +1211,14 @@ static inline int policy_to_flow_dir(int
}
static struct xfrm_policy *xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(struct sock *sk, int dir,
- const struct flowi *fl)
+ const struct flowi *fl, u16 family)
{
struct xfrm_policy *pol;
struct net *net = sock_net(sk);
read_lock_bh(&net->xfrm.xfrm_policy_lock);
if ((pol = sk->sk_policy[dir]) != NULL) {
- bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl,
- sk->sk_family);
+ bool match = xfrm_selector_match(&pol->selector, fl, family);
int err = 0;
if (match) {
@@ -2150,7 +2149,7 @@ struct dst_entry *xfrm_lookup(struct net
if (sk && sk->sk_policy[XFRM_POLICY_OUT]) {
num_pols = 1;
- pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl);
+ pols[0] = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, XFRM_POLICY_OUT, fl, family);
err = xfrm_expand_policies(fl, family, pols,
&num_pols, &num_xfrms);
if (err < 0)
@@ -2428,7 +2427,7 @@ int __xfrm_policy_check(struct sock *sk,
pol = NULL;
if (sk && sk->sk_policy[dir]) {
- pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl);
+ pol = xfrm_sk_policy_lookup(sk, dir, &fl, family);
if (IS_ERR(pol)) {
XFRM_INC_STATS(net, LINUX_MIB_XFRMINPOLERROR);
return 0;