From: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Subject: userfaultfd_zeropage: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone In the non-cooperative userfaultfd case, the process exit may race with outstanding mcopy_atomic called by the uffd monitor. Returning -ENOSPC instead of -EINVAL when mm is already gone will allow uffd monitor to distinguish this case from other error conditions. Unfortunately I overlooked userfaultfd_zeropage when updating userfaultd_copy(). Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1501136819-21857-1-git-send-email-rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fixes: 96333187ab162 ("userfaultfd_copy: return -ENOSPC in case mm has gone") Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@xxxxxxxxxx> Cc: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- fs/userfaultfd.c | 2 ++ 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+) diff -puN fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd_zeropage-return-enospc-in-case-mm-has-gone fs/userfaultfd.c --- a/fs/userfaultfd.c~userfaultfd_zeropage-return-enospc-in-case-mm-has-gone +++ a/fs/userfaultfd.c @@ -1643,6 +1643,8 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct u ret = mfill_zeropage(ctx->mm, uffdio_zeropage.range.start, uffdio_zeropage.range.len); mmput(ctx->mm); + } else { + return -ENOSPC; } if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage))) return -EFAULT; _