On Wed, Aug 21, 2013 at 12:58:15AM +0200, Willy Tarreau wrote: > Hi Greg, > > On Tue, Aug 20, 2013 at 03:40:32PM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > > Hi all, > > > > Given that I had to just revert a patch in the recent stable releases > > that didn't get enough time to "bake" in Linus's tree (or in -next), I > > figured it was worth discussing some possible changes with how "fast" I > > pick up patches for stable releases. > > > > So, how about this proposal: > > > > - I will wait for a -rc to come out with the patch in it before putting > > it into a stable release, unless: > > - the maintainer ACKs it, or sends it directly (like DaveM does > > for networking patches) > > - I have seen enough discussion about a patch to show that it > > really does fix something / is good / doesn't cause problems. > > - obviously safe, i.e. "add a device id" type thing. > > > > Given that we have -rc releases every week, except for the initial -rc1 > > release, I don't think this will really cause any major delays. > > In the last discussion you initiated on the subject, I proposed something > even more conservative which was the same as above except instead of > "wait for a -rc", it was "wait for rc1 after a full release containing > the patch", unless one of the conditions you proposed, or another one > which would be a tag "urgent" or something like this in the patch. Waiting 3 months is too long, in my opinion, sorry. thanks, greg k-h -- To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html