On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 05:02:54PM +0300, Nikolay Borisov wrote: > > > On 25.07.2017 16:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 25, 2017 at 06:47:45AM -0700, Greg KH wrote: > >> Oh, and I need an ack from the xfs maintainers to be able to take this, > >> there must be some reason they didn't backport it like they did for a > >> number of other xfs patches... > > > > In general we'd like to see xfstests runs for all stable backports, > > because file system code is hairy. > > > > So for any xfs stable backports please send the list of patches you > > want backported, and tell us that you did indeed run xfstests. No > > proof is required, we'd like to trust our contributors. > > > > Before including this in our enterprise distribution I did run xfstest > with and without the patch and there was no difference in the result. > Hence I sent the patch. Looks fine to me... Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <darrick.wong@xxxxxxxxxx> --D > -- > To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-xfs" in > the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html