Hi Greg (and google search),
ADSL/ATM linklayer shaping were broken in kernel release from 3.8 to
3.10 by commit 56b765b79 ("htb: improved accuracy at high rates").
I can see that 3.9-stable is marked EOL, and 3.8-stable also seems
closed. I guess it is up to Greg, how far the commits described below
can be backported. Below is the commit needed for a 3.9 backport.
This was not the only regression introduced by the regression commit,
several fixes were required:
(Refactor/change commit for easy 3.9 backport step (in v3.10-rc1)):
commit 6906f4ed6f8 (htb: add HTB_DIRECT_QLEN attribute)
The following commit fixes are in 3.10-rc5:
commit 01cb71d2d47 (net_sched: restore "overhead xxx" handling)
commit 5343a7f8be1 (net_sched: htb: do not mix 1ns and 64ns time units)
The following commit fixes are in 3.10-rc6:
commit 40edeff6e1c (net_sched: qdisc_get_rtab() must check data[] array)
(this fix goes further back, but needed for linklayer atm, see below[1])
Refactor improvements (v3.11-rc1):
commit 130d3d68b52 (net_sched: psched_ratecfg_precompute() improvements)
The linklayer ATM/ADSL fix, reached 3.11-rc6:
commit 8a8e3d84b17 (net_sched: restore "linklayer atm" handling)
[1] Eric Dumazet also found a general "linklayer atm" regression
(dating way-back), which could cause rate-tables to get wrongly shared
between the same rates with-and-without linklayer atm settings.
Addressed/fixed in (3.10-rc6:):
- commit 40edeff6e1c (net_sched: qdisc_get_rtab() must check data[] array)
When configuring two completely equal rates, the kernel detects that
these two equal rates can share the same rate-table. But the kernel
didn't check if the rate-table data had been modified, which is done
in the linklayer atm case.
In practice, this often isn't a problem, as overhead parameter is
usually combined with the linklayer parameter.
The regression commit 56b765b79 ("htb: improved accuracy at high
rates"), is not all bad, it did provided a significantly improved rate
shaping accuracy. The old rate-table based system, which this commit
removed, would get inaccurate at rates above 100Mbit/s.
(ps. I'm the original author of http://www.adsl-optimizer.dk/ and
http://sourceforge.net/projects/adsl-optimizer/)
--
Best regards,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer
MSc.CS, Sr. Network Kernel Developer at Red Hat
Author of http://www.iptv-analyzer.org
LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/brouer
--
To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe stable" in
the body of a message to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html