4.9-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know. ------------------ From: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> commit c59f29cb144a6a0dfac16ede9dc8eafc02dc56ca upstream. The 's' flag is supposed to indicate that a softirq is running. This can be detected by testing the preempt_count with SOFTIRQ_OFFSET. The current code tests the preempt_count with SOFTIRQ_MASK, which would be true even when softirqs are disabled but not serving a softirq. Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1481300417-3564-1-git-send-email-pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx Signed-off-by: Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@xxxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Amit Pundir <amit.pundir@xxxxxxxxxx> Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- kernel/trace/trace.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) --- a/kernel/trace/trace.c +++ b/kernel/trace/trace.c @@ -1906,7 +1906,7 @@ tracing_generic_entry_update(struct trac #endif ((pc & NMI_MASK ) ? TRACE_FLAG_NMI : 0) | ((pc & HARDIRQ_MASK) ? TRACE_FLAG_HARDIRQ : 0) | - ((pc & SOFTIRQ_MASK) ? TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ : 0) | + ((pc & SOFTIRQ_OFFSET) ? TRACE_FLAG_SOFTIRQ : 0) | (tif_need_resched() ? TRACE_FLAG_NEED_RESCHED : 0) | (test_preempt_need_resched() ? TRACE_FLAG_PREEMPT_RESCHED : 0); }