3.16.46-rc1 review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
commit f2200ac311302fcdca6556fd0c5127eab6c65a3e upstream.
When the perf_branch_entry::{in_tx,abort,cycles} fields were added,
intel_pmu_lbr_read_32() wasn't updated to initialize them.
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fixes: 135c5612c460 ("perf/x86/intel: Support Haswell/v4 LBR format")
Signed-off-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@xxxxxxxxxx>
[bwh: Backported to 3.16:
- There's no perf_branch_entry::cycles field
- Adjust filename]
Signed-off-by: Ben Hutchings <ben@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/perf_event_intel_lbr.c
@@ -268,6 +268,8 @@ static void intel_pmu_lbr_read_32(struct
cpuc->lbr_entries[i].to = msr_lastbranch.to;
cpuc->lbr_entries[i].mispred = 0;
cpuc->lbr_entries[i].predicted = 0;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].in_tx = 0;
+ cpuc->lbr_entries[i].abort = 0;
cpuc->lbr_entries[i].reserved = 0;
}
cpuc->lbr_stack.nr = i;