WTF: patch "[PATCH] crypto: ccp - Add a module author" was seriously submitted to be applied to the 4.9-stable tree?

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



The patch below was submitted to be applied to the 4.9-stable tree.

I fail to see how this patch meets the stable kernel rules as found at
Documentation/process/stable_kernel_rules.rst.

I could be totally wrong, and if so, please respond to 
<stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> and let me know why this patch should be
applied.  Otherwise, it is now dropped from my patch queues, never to be
seen again.

thanks,

greg k-h

------------------ original commit in Linus's tree ------------------

>From ac50b78b22cddb8a85b264b1f172c4239e826fd2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 25 Apr 2017 08:59:44 -0500
Subject: [PATCH] crypto: ccp - Add a module author

CC: <stable@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> # 4.9.x+

Signed-off-by: Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Herbert Xu <herbert@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

diff --git a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
index 92d1c6959f08..b7504562715c 100644
--- a/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
+++ b/drivers/crypto/ccp/ccp-dev.c
@@ -31,6 +31,7 @@
 #include "ccp-dev.h"
 
 MODULE_AUTHOR("Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@xxxxxxx>");
+MODULE_AUTHOR("Gary R Hook <gary.hook@xxxxxxx>");
 MODULE_LICENSE("GPL");
 MODULE_VERSION("1.0.0");
 MODULE_DESCRIPTION("AMD Cryptographic Coprocessor driver");




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Kernel Development Newbies]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Video for Linux]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Yosemite Hiking]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]