4.4-stable review patch. If anyone has any objections, please let me know.
------------------
From: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
[ Upstream commit 91298eec05cd8d4e828cf7ee5d4a6334f70cf69a ]
For such a file mapping,
[0-4k][hole][8k-12k]
In NO_HOLES mode, we don't have the [hole] extent any more.
Commit c1aa45759e90 ("Btrfs: fix shrinking truncate when the no_holes feature is enabled")
fixed disk isize not being updated in NO_HOLES mode when data is not flushed.
However, even if data has been flushed, we can still have trouble
in updating disk isize since we updated disk isize to 'start' of
the last evicted extent.
Reviewed-by: Chris Mason <clm@xxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@xxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@xxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <alexander.levin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
fs/btrfs/inode.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
--- a/fs/btrfs/inode.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/inode.c
@@ -4397,8 +4397,19 @@ search_again:
if (found_type > min_type) {
del_item = 1;
} else {
- if (item_end < new_size)
+ if (item_end < new_size) {
+ /*
+ * With NO_HOLES mode, for the following mapping
+ *
+ * [0-4k][hole][8k-12k]
+ *
+ * if truncating isize down to 6k, it ends up
+ * isize being 8k.
+ */
+ if (btrfs_fs_incompat(root->fs_info, NO_HOLES))
+ last_size = new_size;
break;
+ }
if (found_key.offset >= new_size)
del_item = 1;
else